Transitional Justice in the Twenty-First Century 2006
DOI: 10.1017/cbo9780511617911.014
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The prosecution of Hissène Habré: International accountability, national impunity

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A state’s ratification of key international human rights instruments could lower the barriers to HRO advocacy during the peace process for at least two reasons. First, although ratification on its own does not guarantee state compliance (Hafner-Burton and Tsutsui, 2005; Hill, 2010), international legal obligations can trigger an indirect enforcement mechanism based on leaders’ fear of damage to reputation or political survival (Conrad and Ritter, 2013; Simmons, 2000). Once a government has made a formal, public commitment to respect human rights, a violation can erode a government’s credibility enough to deter its retaliation against HROs.…”
Section: Conditions That Facilitate Hro Advocacymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A state’s ratification of key international human rights instruments could lower the barriers to HRO advocacy during the peace process for at least two reasons. First, although ratification on its own does not guarantee state compliance (Hafner-Burton and Tsutsui, 2005; Hill, 2010), international legal obligations can trigger an indirect enforcement mechanism based on leaders’ fear of damage to reputation or political survival (Conrad and Ritter, 2013; Simmons, 2000). Once a government has made a formal, public commitment to respect human rights, a violation can erode a government’s credibility enough to deter its retaliation against HROs.…”
Section: Conditions That Facilitate Hro Advocacymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Reed Brody argues that there is often a tension between the drive for international accountability (which implies the requirement to remember) and the impetus for national impunity for those who committed crimes (which implies the requirement to forget). Brody gives the example of public memory in Chad, in which the notorious torture site of 'The Piscine' is still publically off limits and with no memorial to the crimes that took place there during the regime of the dictator, Hissene Habre (Brody, 2006). A significant impetus for the development of international discourse on the right to memory has arisen from the Southern Cone, and relates to the demand for public recognition and remembering of atrocities under dictatorial rule.…”
Section: The 'Right To Memory' Debatementioning
confidence: 99%