1976
DOI: 10.1016/0014-4827(76)90296-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The proportion of cells labeled with tritiated thymidine as a function of population doubling level in cultures of fetal, adult, mutant, and tumor origin

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

1978
1978
2005
2005

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 51 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Because normal cells senesce slowly in culture, fibroblasts from patients with the acceleratedaging syndrome progeria, which become senescent more rapidly than normal cells, were chosen for this study (33). Progeria cells were subcultured until they exhibited profound morphological changes and senescence-associated ␤-galactosidase activity, a marker of the senescent state (29).…”
Section: Opsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Because normal cells senesce slowly in culture, fibroblasts from patients with the acceleratedaging syndrome progeria, which become senescent more rapidly than normal cells, were chosen for this study (33). Progeria cells were subcultured until they exhibited profound morphological changes and senescence-associated ␤-galactosidase activity, a marker of the senescent state (29).…”
Section: Opsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[3H]thymidine and culture age (13). Theoretical studies have predicted that the distribution of CSs obtained from human fibroblast cultures would be a sensitive index of the number of in vitro PDR (in vitro cell culture "age") (14).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Studies based upon clone size analysis indicate an increased number of nondividing cells with advancing population doubling level (PDL) (11,12); however, this result has been criticized as possibly related to cloning conditions not present in mass culture (13). Autoradiographic analysis of HDFC cultures has yielded results that have been interpreted as showing no noncycling population (14), noncycling cells arising only in the last 10 population doubling levels (15), or proportions of noncycling cells progressively increasing with age (16). The inconsistencies are presumably related to problems with method (13) and may be explained in part by the use of [3H]thymine pulse periods that are too short to label slowly dividing cells, or the proliferation of labeled cells during the labeling interval.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%