The promise of coworking environments: a content analysis of the positioning of collaborative workspaces in Amsterdam

Cabral, Victor; Winden, Willem van

doi:10.1504/ijesb.2020.10030043

Cited by 2 publications

(2 citation statements)

References 0 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…The literature review conducted for this paper on the phenomenon 'co-location' shows that business co-location has been studied in previous research. Even if economic theories indirectly or directly has discussed the phenomenon, the concept has most explicitly been studied from a context of cluster theories (Cooke, 2002;McKelvey et al, 2003;Stuart and Sorenson, 2003;Yeung et al, 2006;Porter et al, 2006;Robinson et al, 2007), Ecosystems/ Network theories (Lemarie´et al, 2001;Gertler and Levitte, 2005;Vanhaverbeke, 2005;Gallivan, 2008;Muegge, 2013;Romero and Molina, 2011;and Valkokari et al, 2017), Learning and Knowledge dissemination (Nonaka, 1994;Inkpen and Tsang, 2005;Simard and West, 2005;Song et al, 2007;Zenun et al, 2007;Chow and Chan, 2008;and Holste and Fields, 2010) and Corporate co-working/collaboration spaces (Bouncken et al, 2016;Ca-bral and van Winden, 2016;Cabral and van Winden, 2018;Nagy and Lindsay, 2018;Irving et al, 2019). Below, some interesting findings will be presented from these streams of research.…”

Section: Discussion Of Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Similar research to Nagy and Lindsay (2018) is the research by Cabral and van Winden (2016). Cabral and van Winden (2018), choose to study four categories of collaborative workspaces; accelerators, incubators, coworking spaces and FabLabs. As both accelerators and incubators provide programs or a set up to support the startup to scale, which is not the case of corporate-startup co-location as defined in this paper, coworking spaces and FabLabs are the two categories most relevant for this paper.…”

Section: Theories On Collaborative Work-spaces and Co-working Spacesmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Technology Management: Corporate-Startup Co-Location and How to Measure the Effects

Steiber

2020

Journal of Technology Management & Innovation

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Rapid technological developments make firms favor the creation of new approaches to technology management. Startups can offer large firms access to new technologies and the emphasis on corporate-startup collaboration has therefore reached a new level. Many models exist and colocation is one of these. While co-location in the context of clusters and innovation systems has been studied in previous literature, research on corporate-startup co-location is limited. The purpose of this paper is to investigate the broader phenomenon of business co-location and based on this review, suggest a framework and metrics to evaluate the effects of corporate-startup co-location. The paper originates from earlier conducted studies on corporate-startup collaboration models. For this paper a literature review on the broader phenomenon of business co-location is conducted. The theoretical contribution is a proposed multi-stakeholder framework and metrics for evaluating the effects of corporate-startup co-location.

show abstract

Section: Discussion Of Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Theories On Collaborative Work-spaces and Co-working Spacesmentioning

confidence: 99%

Technology Management: Corporate-Startup Co-Location and How to Measure the Effects

Steiber

2020

Journal of Technology Management & Innovation

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

Reintroducing technology to the coworking debate: prospects and problematics

Sorrentino¹,

Tirabeni²,

Toraldo³

2023

Studi Organizzativi

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The paper selectively overviews extant research on coworking in order to illustrate: i) the role assigned to technology in coworking settings; and ii) how a more comprehensive account of technology could provide a richer interpretation of the future of work. Drawing on the framework originally proposed by Orlikowski and Iacono (2001), the article identifies current themes and trends in the coworking debate. The main finding is that the role of ICTs (Information and Communication Technologies) is not only under-represented, but that two key elements are noticeably absent from the discourse: the autonomy-control linkage and the temporal-spatial configuration of work. The paper illuminates those areas of the coworking puzzle in which new politics of time and space call for further investigation, positing that the scholarly spotlight needs to retrain on the role of technology.

show abstract

The promise of coworking environments: a content analysis of the positioning of collaborative workspaces in Amsterdam

Cited by 2 publications

References 0 publications

Technology Management: Corporate-Startup Co-Location and How to Measure the Effects

Technology Management: Corporate-Startup Co-Location and How to Measure the Effects

Reintroducing technology to the coworking debate: prospects and problematics

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About