The PROMETHEE multiple criteria decision making analysis for selecting the best membrane prepared from sulfonated poly(ether ketone)s and poly(ether sulfone)s for proton exchange membrane fuel cell

Nikouei, Mohammad Ali; Oroujzadeh, Maryam; Mehdipour‐Ataei, Shahram

doi:10.1016/j.energy.2016.12.052

Cited by 40 publications

(11 citation statements)

References 37 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…The goal in Promethee I is full rank. While Promethee II is used to make binary comparisons between both criteria, Promethee III deals with ranges, and Promethee IV deals with numbers [46]. According to an exemplary Promethee II method, the calculation consists of four main stages [47].…”

Section: Preference Ranking Organization Methods For Enrichment Evaluation (Promethee)mentioning

confidence: 99%

Multi-criteria Decision Making Through Soft Computing and Evolutionary Techniques

Bayraktar

Gupta

2020

Materials Forming, Machining and Tribology

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Time, cost and quality factors should be taken into consideration to increase productivity in production. Innovative approaches and solutions in manufacturing can be obtained by controlling the independent variables affecting these factors. For this reason, the use of optimization techniques based on different algorithm structures is increasing. Multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) tools such as ANN (Artificial neural network), FL (Fuzzy logic), GA (Genetic algorithm), PSO (Particle swarm optimization), GRA (Grey relational analyses), TOPSIS (Technique for order of preference by similarity to ideal solution), PROMETHEE (Preference Ranking Organization Method for Enrichment Evaluation), AHP (Analytic Hierarchy Process), ELECTRE (Elimination Et Choix Traduisant la REaite) and hybrid are commonly used. Particularly, it is preferred in comparative analysis in the literature for optimum parameter determination and prediction of results in machinability studies. Throughout this chapter, research based on the studies on multi-criteria decision-making tools is discussed. Moreover, various characteristics and difference among these tools are also reported.

show abstract

Section: Preference Ranking Organization Methods For Enrichment Evaluation (Promethee)mentioning

confidence: 99%

Multi-criteria Decision Making Through Soft Computing and Evolutionary Techniques

Bayraktar

Gupta

2020

Materials Forming, Machining and Tribology

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…In PROMETHEE 2, basing on 0 , a we construct an outranking graph of alternatives that are classified from the alternative of the highest net flow to the lesser one. PROMETHEE has resulted in the development of software called PROMCALC (PROMETHEE CALCulations) (Mareschal and Brans, 1986), Decision Lab (Geldermann and Zhang, 2001) and other software developed in the literature (Nikouei et al, 2017;Sharma and Bawa, 2016). It has been successfully applied for solving real decision problems in many areas including outsourcing, logistics, transportation, environment management, business and finance (Huang, 2017;Behzadian et al, 2010;Nikouei et al, 2017;Brans and De Smet, 2016).…”

Section: Revised Ahp Methods (Ahpr)mentioning

confidence: 99%

Hybrid approach using multi-criteria methods and mathematical programming for outsourcing logistic problem

Bidani

Frikha

2018

IJIEI

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The decision maker can meet difficult decision problems in the presence of a multiple criteria. Indeed, the choice of a provider is a multi-criteria decision problem. This is the case of this paper which allows solving a logistics outsourcing problem based on multi-criteria decision aid. Several multi-criteria methods require a direct providing of parameters so that the decision maker obtains an alternatives ranking such as 'PROMETHEE' that is a method with multiple criteria. However, this task of direct and precise fixation of parameter values is quite difficult which poses the subjectivity problem of provided parameters. To reduce and overcome this problem, we propose a new multi-criteria approach which hybrids objective methods. However, this hybrid approach has some disadvantages. The results of the hybrid method are integrated in a mathematical program to choose a transport provider within the Tunisian Chemical Group (GCT) and determine the number of providers and optimal transported quantities.

show abstract

“…The GAIA (Geometrical Analysis for Interactive Aids) plane is a graphical tool which is part of the PROMETHEE software. This tool helps better understand a multidimensional MCDA problem by projecting it to a two-dimensional figure while losing minimum information (Nikouei et al, 2017). The GAIA plane is constructed by decomposing the net outranking flow 𝜑(𝑎) by means of a principal component analysis (PCA) algorithm.…”

Section: Gaia Planementioning

confidence: 99%

An integrated FMEA and MCDA based risk management approach to support life extension of subsea facilities in high-pressure–high-temperature (HPHT) conditions

Shafiee

Animah

2020

Journal of Marine Engineering & Technology

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

The PROMETHEE multiple criteria decision making analysis for selecting the best membrane prepared from sulfonated poly(ether ketone)s and poly(ether sulfone)s for proton exchange membrane fuel cell

Cited by 40 publications

References 37 publications

Multi-criteria Decision Making Through Soft Computing and Evolutionary Techniques

Multi-criteria Decision Making Through Soft Computing and Evolutionary Techniques

Hybrid approach using multi-criteria methods and mathematical programming for outsourcing logistic problem

An integrated FMEA and MCDA based risk management approach to support life extension of subsea facilities in high-pressure–high-temperature (HPHT) conditions

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About