2023
DOI: 10.1111/nep.14165
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The prognostic value of CHA2DS2‐VASc and modified‐CHADS2 scores for cardiovascular events in diabetics and non‐diabetics haemodialysis patients

Abstract: Aim CHA2DS2‐VASc and modified‐CHADS2 score can easily estimate the risk of stroke in atrial fibrillation. Study's purpose was to evaluate these in haemodialysis patients, and assess the effect of diabetes mellitus (DM). Methods The scores calculated in 237 haemodialysis patients, 121 diabetics (58 females) and 116 non‐diabetics (41 females). Results correlated to cardiovascular events (acute myocardial infarction, atrial fibrillation, heart failure, peripheral arterial disease, stroke, mortality). Results CHA2… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 32 publications
(65 reference statements)
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The assessment tool for evaluating the risk of stroke in patients with AF, known as the congestive heart failure, hypertension, age, diabetes mellitus, prior stroke or TIA or thromboembolism, vascular disease, age, sex category (CHA2DS2-VASc) score [5], has been associated with cardiovascular events and mortality in diverse patient groups, including those with diabetes [6] and individuals without AF [7]. Nevertheless, tools specifically designed to assess mortality risk in patients with AF are lacking.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The assessment tool for evaluating the risk of stroke in patients with AF, known as the congestive heart failure, hypertension, age, diabetes mellitus, prior stroke or TIA or thromboembolism, vascular disease, age, sex category (CHA2DS2-VASc) score [5], has been associated with cardiovascular events and mortality in diverse patient groups, including those with diabetes [6] and individuals without AF [7]. Nevertheless, tools specifically designed to assess mortality risk in patients with AF are lacking.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%