2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.ejso.2019.03.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The prognostic value of sarcopenia in patients with surgically treated urothelial carcinoma: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
21
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
1
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“… 4 In addition, sarcopenia was associated with a lower 5-year disease-free survival (DFS) rate [RR = 1.59, 95% CI = (1.01, 2.52); p = 0.046]. 4 Similar results were also reported for pancreatic cancer, 5 hepatocellular carcinoma, 6 urothelial carcinoma, 7 hematological malignancies, 8 and ovarian cancer. 9 Loss of skeletal muscle mass during neoadjuvant radiochemotherapy in rectal cancer patients is an independent prognostic factor for DFS and distant metastasis-free survival following curative intent resection.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 55%
“… 4 In addition, sarcopenia was associated with a lower 5-year disease-free survival (DFS) rate [RR = 1.59, 95% CI = (1.01, 2.52); p = 0.046]. 4 Similar results were also reported for pancreatic cancer, 5 hepatocellular carcinoma, 6 urothelial carcinoma, 7 hematological malignancies, 8 and ovarian cancer. 9 Loss of skeletal muscle mass during neoadjuvant radiochemotherapy in rectal cancer patients is an independent prognostic factor for DFS and distant metastasis-free survival following curative intent resection.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 55%
“…Then, we chose the newest meta‐analysis with the largest number of studies. Finally, 54 health‐related outcomes extracted from 30 meta‐analyses 10,22‐50 were reported in this umbrella review. These 54 outcomes were mainly about prognostic outcomes of tumor, postoperative outcomes, age‐related outcomes, metabolic outcomes, and other outcomes.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Accumulating evidence indicates that increased systemic inflammatory response and a low nutritional status play important roles in the tumor progression and metastasis, which influence treatment outcomes, prognosis, and survival 12 , 13 . In recent years, the role of inflammation or nutrition-related factors, including NLR, PLR, albumin levels, and sarcopenia, in malignant tumors have attracted increased attention as significant predictors for various cancers that can reflect tumor' progression 7 , 8 , 14 - 16 . In the current study, high SII and low PNI were correlated with old age, larger tumor size, LVI, pathologic T stage, N stage, and other clinical parameters indicative of an aggressive phenotype, which were consistent with the findings of a previous study.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%