2021
DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2021.790458
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Prognostic Value of NANO Scale Assessment in IDH-Wild-Type Glioblastoma Patients

Abstract: BackgroundIDH-wild-type glioblastoma (GBM) is the most frequent brain-derived malignancy. Despite intense research efforts, it is still associated with a very poor prognosis. Several parameters were identified as prognostic, including general physical performance. In neuro-oncology (NO), special emphasis is put on focal deficits and cognitive (dys-)function. The Neurologic Assessment in Neuro-Oncology (NANO) scale was proposed in order to standardize the assessment of neurological performance in NO. This study… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

2
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These studies were heterogeneous, including patients with different diagnoses such as glioblastoma, low-grade glioma, meningioma, and neurological patients in general. The NANO scale has been employed in both prospective studies (13)(14)(15)(16)(17) and retrospective ones (18)(19)(20)(21)(22)(23). Despite the need for NANO validation with retrospective data, there appears to be no significant loss of clinical information.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These studies were heterogeneous, including patients with different diagnoses such as glioblastoma, low-grade glioma, meningioma, and neurological patients in general. The NANO scale has been employed in both prospective studies (13)(14)(15)(16)(17) and retrospective ones (18)(19)(20)(21)(22)(23). Despite the need for NANO validation with retrospective data, there appears to be no significant loss of clinical information.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The presented case illustrates our approach to steering through this intersection. It is crucial for every patient to be successful in this attempt, since both decreased neurological performance and decreased extent of resection are negative prognostic markers for survival time of patients with glioblastoma [15,16].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several clinical and radiological parameters were identified as being associated with survival prognosis. This includes the extent of resection (EOR), O6methylguanine DNA methyltransferase (MGMT) promoter methylation status [6], patient age at time of diagnosis [7], tumor location, or occurrence of neurological deficits [8,9].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%