2020
DOI: 10.3344/kjp.2020.33.1.54
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The prognostic value of median nerve thickness in diagnosing carpal tunnel syndrome using magnetic resonance imaging: a pilot study

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
15
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

5
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
0
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A diagnosis is typically made based on the physical examination and case history, even though in a few cases magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) might be indicated to rule out another disease in the location [ 5 , 6 ]. An important positive sign on physical examination is local tenderness superior to the joint line and lateral knee inferior to the epicondyle.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…A diagnosis is typically made based on the physical examination and case history, even though in a few cases magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) might be indicated to rule out another disease in the location [ 5 , 6 ]. An important positive sign on physical examination is local tenderness superior to the joint line and lateral knee inferior to the epicondyle.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Previous studies assessed the ITB thickness (ITBT) using a measurement at the approximate “halfway” point of the ITB [ 3 ]. However, an asymmetrical tear and partial thickening of the ITB can occur at any time [ 5 ]. Thus, measurement mistakes could occur routinely.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…T1 weighted images provide excellent anatomical images at the location of tendon injury. [ 25 27 ] Our current results show that the AUC value of ROC for predicting PTTD was 0.95 with a sensitivity of 92.9% and a specificity of 90.0% in PTTCSA, and 0.92 with a sensitivity of 85.7% and a specificity of 85.0% in PTTT. These results suggest that the PTTCSA is a better predictor of PTTD than is the PTTT.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 55%
“…Second, erroneous measurements of the CFLCSA and CFLT may happen on A-MRI. Even though we were trying to analyze these morphologic measurement methods and view the CFL at the coronal image section clearly, inhomogeneity of the coronal section images was still possible due to discrepancies in the cutting level or angle in the A-MRI resulting from individual anatomic differences and technical problems (25). Third, despite there being several alternative imaging diagnostic tools for evaluating AI, such as US examination (26,27), arthroscopy, manual anterior drawer test, or stress radiography, our research protocol analyzed only the measurement of the CFLCSA and CFLT using A-MRI.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%