2014
DOI: 10.1111/his.12398
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The prognostic significance of the aberrant extremes of p53 immunophenotypes in breast cancer

Abstract: Patients with extreme p53 IHC expression have a worse OS than those with NE expression. Accounting for EN as well as EP expression improves the prognostic impact. Extreme expression positively correlates with nodal stage and histological grade, and negatively with hormone receptor status. Extreme expression may relate to specific mutational status.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

7
78
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 64 publications
(85 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
7
78
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Full clinical and pathological follow-up was available for each patient, and full details regarding the cohort have been published previously. 8 Of note, 169 cases were Grade 3 (58%), 119 cases Grade 2 (41%) and 5 cases Grade 1 (2%), while at time of diagnosis 175 tumors were ER +ve (60%), 115 ER -ve (39%) and 3 had unknown ER status (1%). All patients received anthracycline-based chemotherapy, with or without radiotherapy.…”
Section: Materials and Methods Study Designmentioning
confidence: 96%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…Full clinical and pathological follow-up was available for each patient, and full details regarding the cohort have been published previously. 8 Of note, 169 cases were Grade 3 (58%), 119 cases Grade 2 (41%) and 5 cases Grade 1 (2%), while at time of diagnosis 175 tumors were ER +ve (60%), 115 ER -ve (39%) and 3 had unknown ER status (1%). All patients received anthracycline-based chemotherapy, with or without radiotherapy.…”
Section: Materials and Methods Study Designmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…8 Immunohistochemistry All IHC was performed in a hybrid laboratory (Northern Ireland Molecular Pathology Laboratory) that has UK Clinical Pathology Accreditation, using established protocols described in detail elsewhere. 8 The antibodies used were as follows: anti-ER (clone 6F11 mouse monoclonal antibody; Leica); anti-PR (clone PgR 636 mouse monoclonal antibody; Dako); anti-HER2 (clone CB11 mouse monoclonal antibody; Leica); anti-p53 (clone DO-7 mouse monoclonal antibody; Dako, Cambridgeshire, UK). In the case of Ki67, the original data set was stained with NCL-Ki67-MM1 antibody on a Leica staining platform with a polymer-based detection system.…”
Section: Materials and Methods Study Designmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations