“…Having said that in 4/6 studies, 12,14,22,24 it was practically identical (8 or 9) and consistent with the accepted definition in the overall CAD population (eg, rSSs >8), 16 we conducted a subgroup analysis restricted to these trials, whose results were consistent with those of the overall results ( Figure II in the Data Supplement), which suggests that this definitions may be suitable to the TAVR population as well. As mentioned above, only 2 studies reported multivariate-adjusted HR for mortality, but they represented >60% of the sample size of this meta-analysis, and their results were again consistent with the results of the overall analysis (HR of 1.6 and 1.7, for the comparison of ICR versus no CAD/reasonable ICR [1.7 and 1.6]compared with an OR of 1.71 for the similar comparison in our meta-analysis).…”