2018
DOI: 10.1097/mnm.0000000000000858
|View full text |Cite|
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The prognostic and diagnostic value of 18F-FDG PET/CT for assessment of symptomatic osteoarthritis

Abstract: F-FDG PET/CT may be helpful with localization of painful abnormalities in the inflamed regions of the joints, which could potentially be used to direct individualized treatment in moderate and severe OA. Furthermore, SUV measurement on F-FDG PET/CT could serve as an inflammation activity index in the knees that may be predictive of outcomes and progression rate of OA.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
8
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
1
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…While not well-studied in the facet joints, there is evidence that FDG activity can indicate an early response to systemic treatment in other inflammatory conditions, including inflammatory arthritis. 17,18 We found that high-grade perifacet findings were more common with gadolinium, supporting the assertion that further investigation with MR imaging protocols including gadolinium, rather than fat-suppressed T2 images alone, would be reasonable. The results also provide initial assessment of the approximate frequency and concordance of potential imaging biomarkers on multiplane fat-suppressed T2, fat-suppressed T1 gadolinium-enhanced, and FDG-PET images using a standardized protocol.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 63%
“…While not well-studied in the facet joints, there is evidence that FDG activity can indicate an early response to systemic treatment in other inflammatory conditions, including inflammatory arthritis. 17,18 We found that high-grade perifacet findings were more common with gadolinium, supporting the assertion that further investigation with MR imaging protocols including gadolinium, rather than fat-suppressed T2 images alone, would be reasonable. The results also provide initial assessment of the approximate frequency and concordance of potential imaging biomarkers on multiplane fat-suppressed T2, fat-suppressed T1 gadolinium-enhanced, and FDG-PET images using a standardized protocol.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 63%
“…First, although the patient population potentially was relatively small, this study describes a unique cohort of acromegaly patients in remission, and is the first study describing both clinical and radiographic OA in the shoulder and feet. Modified KL atlases based on the existing KL atlases of the knee and hand were used for the glenohumeral and MTP joints, similar to previous studies [49][50][51][52][53][54][55]. No (modified) KL atlas was available for the acromioclavicular and sternoclavicular joints, and, therefore, as mentioned prior, solely the glenohumeral joint of the shoulder was assessed.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since, to date, no official KL atlas for the shoulder and forefoot joints exists, glenohumeral joints, and MTP1-5 and IP1 joints were semi-quantitively scored according to a modified KL scoring system based on the KL atlas of the knee and hands (especially MCP joints), respectively, similar to several previous studies [49][50][51][52][53][54][55]. KL scores were defined as follows: 0, normal bone contour, no JSN, no OP, no sclerosis; 1, doubtful JSN, possible OP; 2, definite OP and possible JSN; 3, multiple moderate OP, definite JSN, some sclerosis, and possible bone contour deformity; 4, severe OP, marked JSN, severe sclerosis, and definite bone contour deformity.…”
Section: Assessment Of Radiographic Oamentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Imaging is part of the diagnostic workup of patients with suspected fungal infection [ 9 ]. Imaging is able to stage the infection, to detect occult or disseminated infection, to monitor antifungal therapy, and to provide prognostic information [ 10 , 11 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%