2016
DOI: 10.1080/14697688.2016.1164337
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The profitability of pairs trading strategies: distance, cointegration and copula methods

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

2
46
0
2

Year Published

2016
2016
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 110 publications
(50 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
2
46
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Rad et al . () find monthly excess returns of 0.83% prior to transaction costs for the cointegration approach—very similar to the 0.88% return of the distance method they run as benchmark. This lack of outperformance of the cointegration approach is possibly driven by the two‐step pairs selection metric.…”
Section: Cointegration Approachsupporting
confidence: 57%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Rad et al . () find monthly excess returns of 0.83% prior to transaction costs for the cointegration approach—very similar to the 0.88% return of the distance method they run as benchmark. This lack of outperformance of the cointegration approach is possibly driven by the two‐step pairs selection metric.…”
Section: Cointegration Approachsupporting
confidence: 57%
“…Rad et al . () provide the first large‐scale empirical application of the cointegration approach on U.S. CRSP data from 1962 until 2014, following GGR and Vidyamurthy (). The spread εij,t between two stocks can be defined as εij,t=Pi,t+γPj,twith Pi and Pj denoting the I (1)‐nonstationary price processes of stocks i and j .…”
Section: Cointegration Approachmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Xie, Liew, Wu, and Zou () find that the copula method is superior to distance method by investigating 89 U.S. stocks in the utility industry with a sample from 2003 to 2012. Rad, Low, and Faff () investigate the performance of the distance method, cointegration method, and copula method on the U.S. stock market from 1962 to 2014 and find that all three methods show significant profitability; however, the distance method outperforms the other methods slightly after adjusting for transaction costs.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Such computation means that one monetary unit is the gross exposure. Rad et al (2016) also consider one monetary unit as the total value of long and short positions. However, Karvinen (2012) and Augustine (2014) argue that the gross exposition should only consider both long and short exposures with one monetary unit each, which amounts for a total of two monetary units.…”
Section: Returns Calculationmentioning
confidence: 99%