2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.jpaa.2015.03.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The profinite polynomial automorphism group

Abstract: We introduce an extension of the (tame) polynomial automorphism group over finite fields: the profinite (tame) polynomial automorphism group, which is obtained by putting a natural topology on the automorphism group. We show that most known candidate non-tame automorphisms are inside the profinite tame polynomial automorphism group, giving another result showing that tame maps are potentially "dense" inside the set of automorphisms. We study the profinite tame automorphism group and show that it is not far fro… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

1
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
(10 reference statements)
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The reason for this is that (1) any affine or triangular map having determinant Jacobian 1 has a preimage under π, (2) any tame automorphism of determinant Jacobian 1 can indeed be written as a composition of affine and triangular automorphisms of determinant Jacobian 1. (See [1] lemma 3.4.) Now an obvious question is whether the map π : SA n (Z) −→ SA n (F p ) is surjective or not; this question is interesting as nonsurjectivity would yield non-tame maps due to the above remark.…”
Section: Two Surjectivity Conjecturesmentioning
confidence: 97%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…The reason for this is that (1) any affine or triangular map having determinant Jacobian 1 has a preimage under π, (2) any tame automorphism of determinant Jacobian 1 can indeed be written as a composition of affine and triangular automorphisms of determinant Jacobian 1. (See [1] lemma 3.4.) Now an obvious question is whether the map π : SA n (Z) −→ SA n (F p ) is surjective or not; this question is interesting as nonsurjectivity would yield non-tame maps due to the above remark.…”
Section: Two Surjectivity Conjecturesmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…For each of these sets, we define ME d n (R) = {F ∈ ME n (R) | deg(F ) ≤ d}, GA d (R) = GA n (R) ∩ ME d n (R) etc. We use the notation x α = x α 1 1 · · · x αn n if α ∈ N n .…”
Section: Notations and Definitionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Thus, Question 1 is a quite important problem for the Tame Generators Problem in positive characteristic. Furthermore, we refer the reader to [5,Section 1.2] for several questions related to [3,Theorem 2.3]. The present paper deals with permutations induced by tame automorphisms over finite fields.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%