The Profile of Students’ Mathematical Problem Solving on the Topic of Two-Variable Linear Equation Systems Based on Thinking Styles

Djadir,; Upu, Hamzah; Sulfianti, Anna

doi:10.1088/1742-6596/1028/1/012164

Cited by 6 publications

(7 citation statements)

References 4 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Two thinking styles found in the present study, Random Abstract and Sequential Concrete, have a distinct process of thinking in establishing a definition, making the opininion, and drawing the conclusion. Similar cases were also found by Djadir et al (2018) where students with Sequential Concrete tend to organize facts, obtain systematically, and present information in a whole range of things, while Random Abstract students tend to have trial and error in solving problems. However, these differences do not preclude success in constructing mathematics knowledge.…”

Section: Drawing Conclusion Drawing Conclusion Analogicallysupporting

confidence: 66%

“…There are also several studies (e.g. Myers & Dyer, 2006;Zakir, 2015;Setyawan, 2017;Sahatcija, Ora, & Ferhataj, 2017;Djadir, Upu, & Sulfianti, 2018) which specifically refer to Gregorc's (1982) model of thinking. Myers and Dyer (2006) found that students with deeply embedded Sequential Abstract learning style preferences exhibited significantly higher critical thinking.…”

Section: A Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Sahatcija et al (2017) revealed that thinking style only had an impact on achievement and not on the perception of learning methods. Furthermore, Djadir et al (2018) concluded students who have thinking styles based on Gregorc have distinct profiles in solving mathematical problems.…”

Section: A Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 2 more Smart Citations

Student’s thinking to identify concave plane based on Gregorc model

Krisdiantoro

Prihatnani

2019

BetaJTM

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

[English]: Mathematics learning should facilitate students' construction of knowledge. In constructing mathematics knowledge, students involve various types of thinking processes and styles. This qualitative research aimed to describe the process of students’ thinking in identifying concave plane based on Gregorc’s model of thinking style. It involved thirty-three 9th-grade students with a different style of thinking. Data were collected through tests, questionnaire, and non-structured interview then descriptively analyzed to reveal students’ thinking process and styles. The present study found two different thinking styles, namely Sequential Concrete (SC) and Random Abstract (RA) from students who successfully identified the concave plane as a kite. There were different thinking processes in the development of definition, opinion, and conclusions from subjects with different thinking styles. However, the difference in the thinking process from each thinking styles do not hamper students’ success in constructing knowledge. Keywords: Thinking process, Concave place, Thinking style, Gregorc model [Bahasa]: Pembelajaran matematika seharusnya memfasilitasi siswa membangun pengetahuan sendiri. Dalam membangun pengetahuan, siswa melibatkan beragam proses dan gaya berpikir. Penelitian kualitatif ini bertujuan untuk mendeskripsikan proses berpikir siswa dalam mengidentifikasi bangun datar concave berdasarkan gaya berpikir model Gregorc. Subjek penelitian adalah 33 siswa kelas IX SMP yang memiliki gaya berpikir berbeda. Data dikumpulkan melalui tes, angket, dan wawancara non-terstruktur kemudian dianalisis secara deskriptif untuk mengungkap gaya dan proses berpikir siswa. Penelitian ini menemukan dua gaya berpikir berbeda yaitu Sekuensial Konkret dan Acak Abstrak dari siswa yang berhasil mengidentifikasi bangun datar concavesebagai layang-layang. Terdapat perbedaan proses berpikir dalam pembentukan pengertian, pembentukan pendapat, dan penarikan kesimpulan dari siswa dengan gaya berpikir berbeda. Namun demikan, perbedaan gaya berpikir dari setiap proses berpikir tidak membatasi keberhasilan siswa dalam mengkonstruksi suatu pengetahuan. Kata kunci: Proses berpikir, Gaya berpikir, Bangun concave, Model Gregorc

show abstract

Section: Drawing Conclusion Drawing Conclusion Analogicallysupporting

confidence: 66%

Section: A Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Student’s thinking to identify concave plane based on Gregorc model

Krisdiantoro

Prihatnani

2019

BetaJTM

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…In the work of Djadir, Hamzah Upu, four research subjects were correlated with different styles of thinking: sequential concrete, sequential abstract, random concrete, and random abstract. It was found that mathematical problem solving profiles influence students' choice of different strategies, as well as the quality and productivity of problem solving [13].…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Stylistic and typological features of students ' thinking as a factor of psychological readiness for innovative activity

et al. 2021

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This article discusses the quantitative characteristics of the features of the mental activity of students with different psychological readiness for innovation. The study involved 100 students of 2-4 bachelor's and 1-2 master's courses studying at the Faculty of "Agro-industrial" of DSTU, aged from 17 to 27 years (M=21.6, SD=4.4 (76.4% men), studying at different levels of education (bachelor's degree – 66.8% (M=19.8, SD=1.6, 54.8% men), master's degree – 34.2% (M=22.6, SD=3.5, 53.5% men). The following methods were used: The questionnaire "Psychological readiness for innovation" (V. E. Klochko, O. M. Krasnoryadtseva); The method of measuring the style of thinking (A. K. Belousova); The questionnaire "Determining the type of thinking and the level of creativity" according to the method of J. Bruner; The questionnaire "Individual styles of thinking" (A. Alekseeva, L. Gromova); statistical methods. The study established the style and typological characteristics of students with different levels of psychological readiness for innovation, and also found that styles and types of thinking, as well as creativity affect the level of readiness for innovation. The prospects of the research are aimed at further studying the factors and predictors of readiness for innovation and developing recommendations for teachers to form universal competencies among students.

show abstract

“…He has a significant role in various disciplines and advances the power of human thought. To master technology and create a future, one needs mastery in mathematics at the beginning of school [1]. This is one of the factors underlying mathematics taught at all levels of education.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Student Worksheet Based on Contextual Teaching and Learning in Linear Equation System Materials of Two Variables

Armiati¹,

Arnilawati²,

Musdi³

2018

Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Mathematics and Mathematics Education 2018 (ICM2E 2018)

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This research was derived from the low ability of students' problem solving. One of the factors was the students didn't understand the problem of mathematics related to real life and the development of learning media like students' worksheet had not been optimal yet in school. From that case, one of the efforts done was by using students' worksheet based on Contextual Teaching and Learning (CTL). The purpose of this research is to describe the characteristics of mathematical worksheet based on CTL to improve the problem solving ability of students on the Two Variable Linear Equation System (SPLDV) context in junior high school that fulfills the criteria of valid valid, practical and effective. This research used plomp development model. The plomp model consists of three phases, namely preliminary research, prototyping and assessment phase. Based on the development has been conducted, acquired Mathematics Students' Worksheet based on CTL on the SPLDV context in junior high school valid, practical and effective.

show abstract

The Profile of Students’ Mathematical Problem Solving on the Topic of Two-Variable Linear Equation Systems Based on Thinking Styles

Cited by 6 publications

References 4 publications

Student’s thinking to identify concave plane based on Gregorc model

Student’s thinking to identify concave plane based on Gregorc model

Stylistic and typological features of students ' thinking as a factor of psychological readiness for innovative activity

Student Worksheet Based on Contextual Teaching and Learning in Linear Equation System Materials of Two Variables

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About