The profile of gender equality issue attention in Western Europe

Abstract

This article investigates the factors that drive governments to pay attention to gender equality issues and place them upon executive agendas. In line with studies of the dynamics of issue attention, which demonstrate the importance of investigating variability in the attention policy makers give to issue demands across policy domains, this article argues that policy issues related to gender equality are multidimensional and patterns in executive attention vary across the different types of gender issues. Multidimensionality of gender equality issues reflects different dynamics in agenda‐setting as different issues invoke contrasting constellations of political representation, institutional friction and veto points. To investigate this variation, this article proposes a twofold distinction between class‐based and status‐based gender equality issues and assesses the validity of three sets of explanations for when gender issues succeed in reaching executive agendas: women in politics, party ideology and economic performance. Drawing on governmental attention datasets from the Comparative Agendas Project, a systematic comparative quantitative analysis of the determinants of gender equality issue attention in five Western European countries is conducted. The main findings confirm that the mechanisms through which different types of gender equality issues gain executive attention differ according to the kind of the gender equality demand. Costly class‐based gender equality issues are more likely to receive executive attention when the economy is performing well, when there is a strong presence of Social Democrats and when there is a high proportion of female MPs. In contrast, economic performance, party politics and women's parliamentary presence do not seem to exert any impact on status‐based issues. Instead, critical actors in the government seem to be the strongest driver for attention over this second type of gender equality issue. This study contributes a gendered dimension to the policy agendas scholarship, adding theoretical and empirical depth to the understanding of how non‐core issues secure their place on full governmental agendas. By focusing on how to secure governmental attention for gender equality issues, the article makes a major contribution to understanding the initial genesis of gender equality policies.

Feminist Activism and the Politics of Reform: When and Why Do States Respond to Demands for Gender Equality Policies?

“…The weight of the factors stacked against success makes the policy victories resulting from women's claims making around the world all the more significant. Explaining these factors is at the core of a maturing field of comparative GEP analysis (Annesley et al, 2015: 528), within which two emerging sub-fields can be discerned: one analysing development policy (Tripp, 2015), the other welfare and post-industrial states (Annesley et al, 2015;Mazur, 2017;Weldon, 2002).…”

Gender, actors, and institutions at the local level: Explaining variation in policies to address violence against women and girls

“…The recent literature focuses on the activities of “critical actors” rather than assuming women will advocate for policy change (Childs & Krook, ). However, research findings consistently show improved outcomes for women where descriptive representation is improved, suggesting it is likely that at least some women political actors will seek to act for women either through pressuring decision makers in executives or directly through legislative activity (Annesley et al, ). For status‐based policies, like VAWG, we noted earlier the importance of female executive actors, as these actors can access power resources to achieve policy change, often in the face of doctrinal resistance.…”

“…Research on politics and gender has examined the determinants of policy change to achieve gender equality (Gains & Lowndes, ; Lovenduski, ; Mazur & Pollack, ). The focus has been on the role of women's movements in provoking change (Abrar, ; Htun & Weldon, ; Montaya, ; Weldon, ), alongside female representatives, executive actors, and “femocrats” (Annesley, Engeli, & Gains, ; Banaszak, ; Holli, ). More recently, feminist institutionalism has argued for the need to appreciate the way in which institutions, understood to be rules‐in‐use, structure advocacy and processes of policy reform across a range of venues.…”

CBME 2017 Gender Equalities on the Czech Labor Market in Comparison with EU

“…The Swedish political goal of gender equality is closely connected to family policy and some reforms (Almqvist, Duvander 2014). According to Annesley et al (2015) increasing women's representation in politics has positive impacts on political attention regarding gender equality issues, gendering policy debates and promoting women-friendly policy outcomes. Grown et al (2016) mentioned that quotas can be a proven tool to increase female representation in political bodies.…”