1971
DOI: 10.1017/s0022112071002490
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The production of turbulence near a smooth wall in a turbulent boundary layer

Abstract: The structure of the flat plate incompressible smooth-surface boundary layer in a low-speed water flow is examined using hydrogen-bubble measurements and also hot-wire measurements with dye visualization. Particular emphasis is placed on the details of the process of turbulence production near the wall. In the zone 0 < y+ < 100, the data show that essentially all turbulence production occurs during intermittent ‘bursting’ periods. ‘Bursts’ are described in some detail.The uncertainties in the bubble data… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

48
452
4
7

Year Published

1975
1975
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 924 publications
(511 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
48
452
4
7
Order By: Relevance
“…However, a fall in turbulence intensity downstream from the reattachment point leads to sediment deposition and propagation of the defect. The process and supporting evidence have been described in detail by Allen [1982], Gyr and Schmid [1989], and Best [1992] following descriptions of microturbulent structures elaborated in the fluid mechanics literature [e.g., Kline et al, 1967;Kim et al, 1971]. However, Allen [1982] pointed out the gross spatial discordance between the scale of these structures, of order D (grain diameter), and even small transverse bed forms.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…However, a fall in turbulence intensity downstream from the reattachment point leads to sediment deposition and propagation of the defect. The process and supporting evidence have been described in detail by Allen [1982], Gyr and Schmid [1989], and Best [1992] following descriptions of microturbulent structures elaborated in the fluid mechanics literature [e.g., Kline et al, 1967;Kim et al, 1971]. However, Allen [1982] pointed out the gross spatial discordance between the scale of these structures, of order D (grain diameter), and even small transverse bed forms.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…The reason is that the distribution function (eq 16) is not the appropriate one over a smooth surface. The work of Kim et al (1971) suggested that for smooth surfaces the eddy-contact time has the distribution 0,(1) = (t/tD exp(-t/ts), over an aerodynamically smooth surface that is based on surface-renewal concepts.…”
Section: Aerodynamically Smooth Surfacementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The existence of the streaks is, however, well established (see e.g. Kline et al 1967;Kim, Kline & Reynolds 1971;Eckelmann 1974). Note that the difference between horseshoe, hairpin and lambda vortices is largely a function of Reynolds number (Head & Banyopadhyay 1981), with low-Reynolds-number structures having a more horseshoe-like appearance.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%