2001
DOI: 10.1016/s1467-0895(00)00012-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The production and use of semantically rich accounting reports on the Internet: XML and XBRL

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
88
0
5

Year Published

2007
2007
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 194 publications
(97 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
1
88
0
5
Order By: Relevance
“…Data intermediaries attempt to alleviate this problem by normalizing the data into standardized formats and categories. This data cleaning procedure distorts the information and hides the subtleties necessary for understanding and analysis (Debreceny and Gray 2001), thus making it potentially inaccurate and/or deceptive and less valuable. XBRL tagging according to set taxonomies is performed by the creators of the information, thus eliminating the need for normalization (DiPiazza and Eccles 2002).…”
Section: Users Of Financial Reportsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Data intermediaries attempt to alleviate this problem by normalizing the data into standardized formats and categories. This data cleaning procedure distorts the information and hides the subtleties necessary for understanding and analysis (Debreceny and Gray 2001), thus making it potentially inaccurate and/or deceptive and less valuable. XBRL tagging according to set taxonomies is performed by the creators of the information, thus eliminating the need for normalization (DiPiazza and Eccles 2002).…”
Section: Users Of Financial Reportsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The use of standardized XBRL taxonomies makes cross-sectional comparisons between companies in a specific industry possible (Bonson et al2009;Bovee et al 2002, Callaghan et al 2002, Debreceny and Gray 2001. While this benefit is possible within an industry, the degree of specialization between industries makes the use of one taxonomy virtually impossible.…”
Section: Users Of Financial Reportsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Therefore, the taxonomies should be able to accommodate financial reporting practices to meet user demands at the country, industry or firm level (Debreceny and Gray 2001;Bovee et al 2005;Debreceny et al 2005;Baldwin et al 2006). …”
Section: Literature Review Of Xbrl Taxonomiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, it has helped the IFRS in its harmonizing efforts by providing a common reporting platform that incorporates the semantics of IFRS for various jurisdictional taxonomies and effectively removed complications associated with jurisdictional reconciliations, thereby reducing gaps that existed in the various member states reporting standards. XBRL therefore provided IFRS reporters with the ability to prepare common illustrative financial statements, but also allows for jurisdictional flexibility and nuances (Debreceny & Gray, 2001;Premuroso & Bhattacharya, 2008; XBRL International). For auditors: more accurate, timely and complete data for analysis which makes it easier to identify anomalies; offers the opportunity for more frequent assessments; enables faster and more efficient research of documents; allows for easier identification of reporting changes and compliance with standards and faster completions of assessments (Willis & Hannon, 2005).…”
Section: Xbrl Benefits and Drawbacksmentioning
confidence: 99%