2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.ara.2016.02.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Production and Exchange of Glass and Stone Beads in Southeast Asia from 500 BCE to the early second millennium CE: An assessment of the work of Peter Francis in light of recent research

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
28
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
4
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 36 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
(68 reference statements)
0
28
0
Order By: Relevance
“…, tab. 4; Dussubieux and Gratuze ; Carter ). Aside from Southeast Asian finds, the presence of South Indian/Sri Lankan glass beads has also been confirmed through analysis at the Early Roman Red Sea port at Quseir, Egypt (Then‐Obłuska and Dussubieux ), in Europe during the Early Byzantine period (Poulain et al .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…, tab. 4; Dussubieux and Gratuze ; Carter ). Aside from Southeast Asian finds, the presence of South Indian/Sri Lankan glass beads has also been confirmed through analysis at the Early Roman Red Sea port at Quseir, Egypt (Then‐Obłuska and Dussubieux ), in Europe during the Early Byzantine period (Poulain et al .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The method of classification and description is based on H.C. Beck (), while the vocabulary is borrowed from P. Francis (). In addition to these two important publications, we have also examined other publications on the corpus of beads in the Near East (Woolley, ; Maxwell‐Hyslop, ; Pinnock, ) and the South and South‐East Asia (Carter, ; Kelly, ; Bellina, ; Barthélemy de Saizieu, ), in order to obtain the most complete bead typology in South Arabia.…”
Section: Typologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The technique that uses the lada produces a particular and diagnostic processing waste, which serves to identify not only the technique but also the various stages of production. The lack of this primary indicator suggests that this kind of bead was not locally produced but was probably imported directly from Indian or south‐eastern centres, as for example Arikamedu or Mantai (Carter, : 17; Lankton & Dussubieux, : 139; Francis, ; 1991: 224).…”
Section: Materials and Techniquesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…High alumina soda glasses are generally not found frequently, but they are recognized in assemblages such as 2 nd /1 st century BC-5 th century AD glass beads from Sri Lanka and South India (Dussubieux, Gratuze, & Blet-Lemarquand, 2010, tab. 4;Dussubieux & Gratuze, 2013;Carter, 2016) which were present in Early Roman Quseir, Egypt (Then-Obłuska & Dussubieux, 2016) and during Early Byzantine period in Europe (Poulain, Scuiller, & Gratuze, 2013;Pion & Gratuze 2016); 4 th -6 th century AD glass beads from upper Nubia in Africa (Then-Obłuska, Wagner, & Kepa-Linowska, 2019); 7 th -8 th century AD Asian glass beads imported to Scandinavia and north Germany (Sode, Gratuze, & Lankton, 2017); 7 th -10 th century AD in Zanzibar (Wood, Panighello, Orsega, Robertshaw, van Elteren Crowther, Horton, & Boivin, 2017); 8 th -12 th century AD glass bracelets from Ḥiṣn al-Tīnātand in Turkey (Swan, Rehren, Dussubieux, & Eger, 2018). Few red opaque glass beads of Asian production found in Scandinavia and northern Germany (defined as group 4) show the most similarity with USTRA-01 as both calcium and aluminum values are around 10 wt% (Sode et al, 2017, Figure 5).…”
Section: Unaltered Fragmentsmentioning
confidence: 99%