The Processing of Somatosensory Information Shifts from an Early Parallel into a Serial Processing Mode: A Combined fMRI/MEG Study

Abstract

The question regarding whether somatosensory inputs are processed in parallel or in series has not been clearly answered. Several studies that have applied dynamic causal modeling (DCM) to fMRI data have arrived at seemingly divergent conclusions. However, these divergent results could be explained by the hypothesis that the processing route of somatosensory information changes with time. Specifically, we suggest that somatosensory stimuli are processed in parallel only during the early stage, whereas the processing is later dominated by serial processing. This hypothesis was revisited in the present study based on fMRI analyses of tactile stimuli and the application of DCM to magnetoencephalographic (MEG) data collected during sustained (260 ms) tactile stimulation. Bayesian model comparisons were used to infer the processing stream. We demonstrated that the favored processing stream changes over time. We found that the neural activity elicited in the first 100 ms following somatosensory stimuli is best explained by models that support a parallel processing route, whereas a serial processing route is subsequently favored. These results suggest that the secondary somatosensory area (SII) receives information regarding a new stimulus in parallel with the primary somatosensory area (SI), whereas later processing in the SII is dominated by the preprocessed input from the SI.

V1 Projection Zone Signals in Human Macular Degeneration Depend on Task Despite Absence of Visual Stimulus

“…In the passive condition, the tactile response for both JMD1 and C1 was found in the postcentral gyrus, which corresponds to the primary somatosensory cortex (S1). [8][9][10][11] The occipital areas did not respond to tactile stimuli for both JMD1 and C1. In contrast, the responses in the OBT condition for JMD1 and C1 differed from those in the passive condition.…”

Bilateral activations in operculo‐insular area show temporal dissociation after peripheral electrical stimulation in healthy adults

“…Somatosensory cortices seem to process information in parallel (Liang et al ., 2011) or serial (Khoshnejad et al ., 2014) manner between brain areas. However, this is still under debate and recent combined fMRI and MEG study demonstrated that early neural activity, first 100 ms after somatosensory stimulus, is best explained by parallel and subsequent activity by serial processing route (Klingner et al ., 2016). It is suggested that insula shares connections with dorsal thalamus (Friedman & Murray, 1986; Augustine, 1996; Dum et al ., 2009) but rather little is known about connections to and from insula.…”

Cause or effect: Altered brain and network activity in cervical dystonia is partially normalized by botulinum toxin treatment

“…Stimuli were applied to the index finger of the right and left hand in a pseudorandomized order (403 images, approximately 17 min, stimuli duration 2 s, interstimulus interval ranged between 20 and 30 s, 20 stimuli to the left and 20 to the right hand separately). A similar fMRI paradigm was employed in our previous studies (Brodoehl et al, 2013; Brodoehl et al, 2015a; Klingner et al, 2016).…”