2008
DOI: 10.1021/bk-2008-0994.ch016
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Process-Oriented Guided Inquiry (Discovery) Laboratory

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
15
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In an environment where the instructor has the opportunity to make significant changes to the experiment, or even change the pedagogy of the laboratory program, then there are alternate pedagogical approaches that can be considered that lessen the need to have closely integrated or sequenced learning experiences.. Inquiry-oriented strategies apply a hierarchy of levels to practical tasks (Hegarty, 1978), from structured and guided inquiry (Lamba and Creegan, 2008;Schroeder and Greenbowe, 2008) to fully open-ended tasks (Roth, 1994) that can provide opportunities for students to gain higher-order process skills (Roth and Roychoudhury, 1993) and a greater ability to adopt scientific ways of doing (Spronken-Smith and Walker, 2010). These strategies present mechanisms for the empowered instructor to create a self-contained laboratory learning experience that garners the desired student learning outcomes and a positive perception, as well as more elusive higher order skills, such as self-regulation in the laboratory 65 learning environment.…”
Section: Implications For Practicementioning
confidence: 99%
“…In an environment where the instructor has the opportunity to make significant changes to the experiment, or even change the pedagogy of the laboratory program, then there are alternate pedagogical approaches that can be considered that lessen the need to have closely integrated or sequenced learning experiences.. Inquiry-oriented strategies apply a hierarchy of levels to practical tasks (Hegarty, 1978), from structured and guided inquiry (Lamba and Creegan, 2008;Schroeder and Greenbowe, 2008) to fully open-ended tasks (Roth, 1994) that can provide opportunities for students to gain higher-order process skills (Roth and Roychoudhury, 1993) and a greater ability to adopt scientific ways of doing (Spronken-Smith and Walker, 2010). These strategies present mechanisms for the empowered instructor to create a self-contained laboratory learning experience that garners the desired student learning outcomes and a positive perception, as well as more elusive higher order skills, such as self-regulation in the laboratory 65 learning environment.…”
Section: Implications For Practicementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Based on these identified concerns, Thompson selected materials in week four that focused on facilitating group work. TAs were introduced to the Process -Oriented Guided Inquiry Learning (POGIL) framework as a technique for facilitating group work within the teaching laboratories (Lamba & Creegan, 2008). POGIL is a very popular tool in undergraduate science education that uses self-managed groups to develop science process skills such as data analysis or hypothesis generation.…”
Section: Week Four: Pogil As a Teaching Toolmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Students drew conclusions based on the compiled set of data as a whole, rather than on their individual experimental results. 15 In this way, experiments done by each isolated student team were converted into a meaningful and collaborative investigation 17 of an authentic scientific question. This relatively simple adjustment more accurately reflects the research laboratory environment because it demonstrates to students the obvious advantages of collaboration and replication.…”
Section: Using Collaborative Work To Generate Reliable and Meaningful...mentioning
confidence: 99%