Proceedings of the Third Symposium on Information Interaction in Context 2010
DOI: 10.1145/1840784.1840842
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The process of serendipity in knowledge work

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
65
0
1

Year Published

2014
2014
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 51 publications
(69 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
1
65
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Our study data loosely supports both main perspectives on serendipity: the unexpected encounter [17], and the purposeful awareness of cues [20]. In both cases, however, there was element of 'surprise' in the process and also there was presence of 'insight' where user made the connection [16].…”
Section: Models and Theories Of Serendipitysupporting
confidence: 83%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Our study data loosely supports both main perspectives on serendipity: the unexpected encounter [17], and the purposeful awareness of cues [20]. In both cases, however, there was element of 'surprise' in the process and also there was presence of 'insight' where user made the connection [16].…”
Section: Models and Theories Of Serendipitysupporting
confidence: 83%
“…Beyond simply encountering new information [11], McCay-Peet & Toms [17] describe serendipity as an event involving unexpectedness and a bi-sociation (mental connection). Conversely, Rubin et al [20] described serendipity as happening when 1) someone is prepared to see cues, 2) an unexpected event occurs, and 3) a connection leads to a fortuitous outcome.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In light of qualitative data acquired through interviews with academic researchers, artists, library users and laypeople, several versions of a process model of serendipity have been developed (Cunha 2005;Lawley & Tompkins 2008;McCay-Peet & Toms 2010;Rubin et al 2011;Makri and Blandford 2012). 8 These process models all include the outcome as a necessary step in serendipitous discovery.…”
Section: Retrospectivity and Emergencementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The micro level analysis of media professionals' search and retrieval practices should be seen in the light of recent research interest in serendipitous search (Makri, Blandford, Woods, Sharples, & Maxwell, 2014;McCay-Peet & Toms, 2010), in relation to studies of media production that highlight the agency of media professionals who create audiovisual content. In line with Havens, Lotz, and Tinic (2009), the analysis aims to understand more quotidian practices of media production by studying industrial processes in conjunction with cultural processes.…”
Section: The Sociomaterials Practices Of Media Productionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…"super encounterers" [Erdelez, 1999] would have "prepared minds" and are open to recognize serendipitous findings) or by triggers embedded in the search system. The literature focuses on how to manage serendipity by optimizing the serendipitous finding of relevant information (Makri et al, 2014;McCay-Peet & Toms, 2010). There seems, however, to be an inherent paradox built into this notion of serendipity management: how can users manage something accidental?…”
Section: Serendipitous Search Behaviour and Creative Retrievalmentioning
confidence: 99%