2015
DOI: 10.1007/s10805-014-9223-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Process of Ethical Decision-Making: Experts vs Novices

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 15 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…One possibility is that novices are more likely to have had recent training relating to plagiarism (particularly in required RCR programs), which may have made them more cautious about any writing-related issues with any ethical concerns. On the other hand, research has shown that experienced researchers spend more time working through decision-making processes related to ethical matters than do novices (Van Valey et al, 2015), so perhaps, novices' more conservative answers were less thoroughly considered than the assessments of their senior colleagues. Or, perhaps, experts have learned from personal experience that recycling text in some situations is common and acceptable in their area of research.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One possibility is that novices are more likely to have had recent training relating to plagiarism (particularly in required RCR programs), which may have made them more cautious about any writing-related issues with any ethical concerns. On the other hand, research has shown that experienced researchers spend more time working through decision-making processes related to ethical matters than do novices (Van Valey et al, 2015), so perhaps, novices' more conservative answers were less thoroughly considered than the assessments of their senior colleagues. Or, perhaps, experts have learned from personal experience that recycling text in some situations is common and acceptable in their area of research.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%