2012
DOI: 10.3103/s0147688212030069
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The problems associated with the evaluation of world-class competitiveness of Russia’s science, as illustrated by clinical medicine

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the case of ambiguous interpretations of KWs the context of its use is involved: SKWs, article title, and abstract. 4. Classification is carried out by several experts; an agreed position on controversial issues is produced.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In the case of ambiguous interpretations of KWs the context of its use is involved: SKWs, article title, and abstract. 4. Classification is carried out by several experts; an agreed position on controversial issues is produced.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The basis of the calculation of various indexes (citation, self citation, Hirsch, impact factor, and many other indexes) constitute purely formal quantitative indicators of the number of publications and citations for certain time periods. These formal indicators are used as a basis for the planning of research activities, including the InCites and SciValSpotlight analytical tools (applications that are based on the WoS and Scopus scientometric indi cators), which are designed to evaluate the current activities of agents of scientific work and used as a tool for decision making in the field of project financing and research groups [3][4][5].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The main reason for developing the system was to create a tool that would help to efficiently collect and analyze data, both personal and generalized across individual research teams and organizations, in order to obtain reliable indicators of performance and focus of the scientific research (Tijssen and Leeuwen, 2006;Starodubov et. al., 2012;Kotsemir, 2012).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Researchers can evaluate the possibility of using the number of citations and introduce the Hirsch h index, Hirsch h core, g index, R index, AR index, and Jin A index indices to determine the effectiveness of sci entific activities; test existing indexes of scientific con tent (WoS, Scopus, GoogleScholar, etc. ); research features for evaluating their effectiveness, particularly in the humanities, social, natural sciences, and techni cal areas [1][2][3][4][5]; study age and gender aspects of effi ciency and productivity in science [6][7][8]; and analyze inter disciplinary interactions [9,10] as well as the possibility of using indices for comparison of national science and scientific specializations [11][12][13][14].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%