2014
DOI: 10.1093/alh/ajt066
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Problem of the Postsecular

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
15
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Among postsecular critics, Taylor is often criticized as being too invested in a secularization narrative that has led to what he calls our secular age. 2 But there is another way to read Taylor's work that 1 Unlike Horton's more narrow use of postsecularism, I am not referring to a particular recontextualization of religious faith such as McClure's (2007) partial faith or Hungerford's (2010) postmodern belief, which Fessenden (2014) has persuasively critiqued as still being beholden to the secularization thesis. See also Pecora (2011), who makes a similar argument about Habermas.…”
Section: The Gift As Moral Sourcementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Among postsecular critics, Taylor is often criticized as being too invested in a secularization narrative that has led to what he calls our secular age. 2 But there is another way to read Taylor's work that 1 Unlike Horton's more narrow use of postsecularism, I am not referring to a particular recontextualization of religious faith such as McClure's (2007) partial faith or Hungerford's (2010) postmodern belief, which Fessenden (2014) has persuasively critiqued as still being beholden to the secularization thesis. See also Pecora (2011), who makes a similar argument about Habermas.…”
Section: The Gift As Moral Sourcementioning
confidence: 99%
“…(Taylor 2007, p. 25). This certainly is an important aspect of Taylor's work, but it also misleads readers from seeing the more complex moves he makes to show, like Fessenden (2014), how entrenched and entwined our religious and secular sources emphasizes a historical narrative of secularity less than the hermeneutic conditions of belief. Focusing on the latter-on the conditions of belief-makes it possible to see him engaged in a postsecularism that goes beyond a project of recovering religion or translating it into other categories.…”
Section: The Gift As Moral Sourcementioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the secularization thesis and the post secular moment, see Coviello and Hickman; Fessenden; Kaufmann; Taylor.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is a question that lurks in the margins of Tracy Fessenden's recent critique of studies of the post‐secular under the auspices of Literature and Religion. In her article for the special issue of American Literary History addressing these developments, Fessenden warns scholars against the easy emancipation narratives and implicit sorting of “good” and “bad” religion, which often emerges – even unintentionally – in disciplinary accounts of religion and the secular. This is reflected in the way that scholars both select and narrativize their objects of study, charting “a path away from a doctrinal definition and toward an expansive, indeterminate space of spiritual power and option” (160).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%