2017
DOI: 10.1177/1359183517725366
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The problem of mechanization: Craft, machines, and ‘centering’ in a Japanese Mingei pottery village

Abstract: This article provides a conceptual basis for 'centering' the relationship between artisanship and mechanization as one would in pottery making. Critical theory dichotomizes handwork from machine-work, emphasizing the division between non-alienated and alienated labor, authenticity and inauthenticity, and experiential resonance and capitalist fetishism. The author demonstrates the theoretical shortcomings and social repercussions of these dualisms through a study of Onta, a Japanese pottery village associated w… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…During this period, the first author engaged in a one-month ceramic training course while concurrently conducting in-depth interviews. This method aligns with recommendations from other researchers in craft studies (Patchett, 2016;O'Connor, 2017;Paredes, 2018). While attending the course, the first author gained comprehensive knowledge of the ceramics making process.…”
Section: Data Collection and Data Analysismentioning
confidence: 75%
“…During this period, the first author engaged in a one-month ceramic training course while concurrently conducting in-depth interviews. This method aligns with recommendations from other researchers in craft studies (Patchett, 2016;O'Connor, 2017;Paredes, 2018). While attending the course, the first author gained comprehensive knowledge of the ceramics making process.…”
Section: Data Collection and Data Analysismentioning
confidence: 75%
“…Correspondence, taking Ingold’s (2017: 14) words ‘is the process by which beings or things literally answer to one another overtime’. Therefore the shape of material culture emerges from the rhythmical correspondence of the maker with the rhythms of materials (Boas, 1955; Boivin, 2000; Ingold, 2000, 2013; Leroi-Gourhan, 1993[1964]; Paredes, 2017). Social morphology, as noted by Mauss (1979[1950]), is shaped by rhythms.…”
Section: Rhythmical Approach To Techniquesmentioning
confidence: 99%