1986
DOI: 10.1086/487442
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Problem of Genuine Evil: A Critique of John Hick's Theodicy

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
2

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 0 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Yet some of his critics accuse him of being guilty of making a similar error. Mesle (1986) for example argues that seeing evil acts as part of a positive process amounts to a denial of genuine evil, because regarding evil and suffering as part of an overall process of soul making means that they become part of an overall process that is positive. However, just because evil is regarded as playing a role within an overarching scheme that is positive, it does not seem to follow that this means that Hick has to deny the existence or genuineness of evil itself, so this criticism seems able to be relatively easily dismissed.…”
Section: Does the Outcome Justify The Process?mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Yet some of his critics accuse him of being guilty of making a similar error. Mesle (1986) for example argues that seeing evil acts as part of a positive process amounts to a denial of genuine evil, because regarding evil and suffering as part of an overall process of soul making means that they become part of an overall process that is positive. However, just because evil is regarded as playing a role within an overarching scheme that is positive, it does not seem to follow that this means that Hick has to deny the existence or genuineness of evil itself, so this criticism seems able to be relatively easily dismissed.…”
Section: Does the Outcome Justify The Process?mentioning
confidence: 99%