Our system is currently under heavy load due to increased usage. We're actively working on upgrades to improve performance. Thank you for your patience.
2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2018.11.205
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The problem of drinking water access: A review of disinfection technologies with an emphasis on solar treatment methods

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
80
0
2

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 211 publications
(100 citation statements)
references
References 133 publications
0
80
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…During the experiment, the original bacterial solution had a Escherichia coli (E. coli) concentration of 0.5~1 × 10 6 CFU/100 mL. E. coli is a traditionally applied indicator to monitor the microbiological water quality since it provide a direct evidence of recent faecal pollution 51 . WHO guideline suggests that no detection of E. coli in 100 mL water sample is required to identify a water source safe to drink.…”
Section: Heavy Metal Removalmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…During the experiment, the original bacterial solution had a Escherichia coli (E. coli) concentration of 0.5~1 × 10 6 CFU/100 mL. E. coli is a traditionally applied indicator to monitor the microbiological water quality since it provide a direct evidence of recent faecal pollution 51 . WHO guideline suggests that no detection of E. coli in 100 mL water sample is required to identify a water source safe to drink.…”
Section: Heavy Metal Removalmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to the World Health Organisation (WHO), approximately 30% of the global population are currently without a safe source of drinking water, 1 which in turn leads to around half a million entirely preventable deaths per year. 1,2 Thus, affordable, simple and safe water treatment systems are necessary to meet the United Nation's Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs), specifically Goal 6 to "ensure availability and sustainable management of water and sanitation for all" by 2030. 3 However, commonly used methods of water treatment are often energetically and chemically intensive, which in turn leads to them being too expensive for use in less affluent areas that typically have some of the most dangerous water conditions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…3 However, commonly used methods of water treatment are often energetically and chemically intensive, which in turn leads to them being too expensive for use in less affluent areas that typically have some of the most dangerous water conditions. 2 Conventional industrial water treatment technologies usually employ chlorination as the means of disinfection, though UV and ozone treatments are also becoming more widespread. 2 For decentralised water treatment in rural areas, chlorination is not always suitable due to the requirement for trained operators, the possibility of toxic by-products, the potential for poor taste, and its ineffectiveness against eggs of certain parasites.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Currently, the disinfection and purification of water takes place through several purification techniques such as the chemical purification (chlorination or ozonation), biological treatment (activated sludge), membrane systems (ultra-filtration, reverse osmosis) or physicochemical treatment (flocculation, coagulation). However, each technique displays its shortcomings [1]. Water disinfection is an issue that has attracted governments and the scientific community since most of outbreaks of diseases come as a result of water and food-borne enteric bacteria.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%