“…By the Kuratowski-Zorn Lemma we find I ⊂ N such that j 1 = j 2 , whenever j 1 , j 2 (22) holds true for all x ∈ S, and by the L.P. Vlasov results the set S is convex, but this is impossible. Theorem 8.10 when compared with [2, Theorem 2.19] has the following differences: first, it is given in a Hilbert space, while [2,Theorem2.19] is given in a more general space, namely in the smooth Efimov-Stechkin space; second, it is not assumed that its boundary is included in a countable union of hyperplanes, as it was done in [2,Theorem]. So, it is natural to expect a result combining advantages of both theorems, but this is not the aim of this paper.…”