The problem of Cerebral dominance the relationship between handedness and language function

Subirana, Antonio

doi:10.1007/bf02928384

Cited by 4 publications

(3 citation statements)

References 17 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…Performance measures of handedness have in general been behavioral demonstrations of the activities listed in questionnaires. Formal routines have been devised by a number of investigators (Roudinesco & Thyss, 1948;Subirana, 1961;Zazzo, 1960).…”

Section: The Measurement Of Handednessmentioning

confidence: 99%

Left-handedness.

Hardyck¹,

Petrinovich²

1977

Psychological Bulletin

518

192

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The phenomenon of left-handedness is reviewed from prehistoric man through contemporary studies of lateralization of cerebral function. The following conclusions seem warranted: Handedness is most appropriately regarded as a continuum ranging from strong right-handedness across mixed-handedness to strong left-handedness. Left-handedness, ranging from moderate through strongly lefthanded, is found in approximately 10% of the population. Evidence for a genetic basis of handedness remains positive, but with no direct link established. There is remarkably little evidence for any association of left-handedness with deficit, as has often been suggested. The familial left-handed show greater recovery of functioning following unilateral cerebral insult than do nonfamilial right-handed and nonfamilial left-handed. Both behavioral and clinical lesion studies indicate systematic differences in lateralization of cerebral function between the right-and left-handed and the familial and nonfamilial left-handed. A classification of handedness and lateralization of cerebral function is suggested, with the right-handed with no family history of left-handedness being the most strongly lateralized and the left-handed with a positive family history of left-handedness showing bilateral localization of functions. The left-handed with no family history of left-handedness are classified as identical in cerebral lateralization with the right-handed with no family history of left-handedness. The possibilities exist that bilaterality of cerebral functioning is either stable in the human race or is changing at an extremely slow rate.In the Old Testament, in the Book of Lord's left hand, what part, if any, it played Psalms (Joint Committee on the New Trans-in the creation of the heavens, and who is lation of the Bible, 1970), the statement is held in the left hand. However, in the New made that the Lord's "right hand is full of Testament, the Book of Matthew (Joint righteousness" (48:10); in the Book of Isaiah, Committee, 1970) provides some fairly specific that his "right hand shall spread out the information on the fate of those individuals heavens" (48:13); and again in Psalms, that at the left hand: his "right hand shall hold me" (139:10). c . ,. , , "",, /-\u rn i i.-j -c. When the Son of Man comes in his glory and allThe Old Testament provides no specific the angels with ^ he will sit in gtate * n 4 thronC| information as to what is contained in the w ; t h all the nations gathered before him. He will separate men into two groups, as a shepherd separates the sheep from the goats and he will place the sheep This work was supported in part by , funds from on his right hand and the goats on his left. Then the Spencer Foundation and from the Committee on the king will say to those on his right hand, "You

show abstract

Section: The Measurement Of Handednessmentioning

confidence: 99%

Left-handedness.

Hardyck¹,

Petrinovich²

1977

Psychological Bulletin

518

192

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Böylelikle, baskın olarak kullanılan beyin bölgesi saptanmaktadır (5). El baskınlığı sağ el dominansı, sol el dominansı ve sağ el lehine az bir fark olmakla birlikte her iki elin birden kullanılabilmesi ambidekstralite durumu olarak görülmektedir (6,7). Sağ elimizi sol beyin, sol elimizi de sağ beyin yönetmektedir.…”

Section: Introductionunclassified

El dominansı ve koroner dominans arası ilişki

Tolunay¹

2019

Turkish Journal of Clinics and Laboratory

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Amaç: Koroner arter hastalığının bilinen risk faktörlerinin dışında, koroner dominans, ektazi, bifürkasyon açısı gibi anatomik risk faktörleride mevcuttur. Fonksiyonel bir serebral lateralizasyon olarak kabul edilen el dominansının bazı hastalıklarla ilişkisi daha önce tanımlanmıştır. Bu çalışmanın amacı genetik faktörler ile belirlenen el dominansı ve koroner dominans arası ilişkiyi tanımlamaktır. Gereç ve Yöntemler: Polikliniğe başvuran, koroner anjiyografi uygulanmış 226 hastanın koroner anjiyografileri değerlendirildi. Hastalar sağ koroner dominant, sol dominant ve dengeli dominant olarak gruplandırıldı. Hastaların el tercihlerini belirlemek için "Oldfield Anketi" kullanıldı. Hastalar sağ el baskın, sol el baskın ve her iki elde baskınlık olarak üç gruba ayrıldı. Koroner dominans ve el dominansı arasındaki ilişki araştırıldı. Bulgular: Anjiyografisi yapılan 226 hastanın 96'sı (%42,5) kadın, 130' u (%57,5) erkekti. 170 hasta (%75, 2) sağ el, 14 hasta sol el (%6,2) ve 42 hasta (%18,6) her iki el baskınlığına sahipti. 160 hastada sağ koroner dominans (%70, 8), 26 hastada sol koroner dominans (%11,5) ve 40 hastada (%17,7) dengeli koroner dominans belirlenmiştir. El dominansı ile cinsiyet arasında istatiksel olarak anlamlı fark bulunamamıştır (p: 0,309). Koroner dominans ve cinsiyet arası anlamlı bir ilişki saptanmamıştır (p:0,114). Koroner arter dominansı ile serebral fonksiyonel dominans arasında istatistiksel olarak anlamlı bir ilişki vardır (p: 0,005). Sonuç: Çalışmamızda koroner arter dominansı ve serebral fonksiyonel dominans arasında istatistiksel olarak anlamlı bir ilişki saptanmıştır. Ancak serebral ve koroner dominansı anatomik düzeyde karşılaştırmak için dominant hemisferi daha net olarak gösteren invaziv bir test olan wada testi ile yapılacak ileri çalışmalara ve anatomik lateralizasyonu karşılaştıran kadavra çalışmalarına ihtiyaç vardır.

show abstract

“…There has developed increasing concern among investigators and clinicians [1,4,5,6,8,9,10,11,13,14,15,19,20,23,26] working with developmental language disability regarding a correlation between certain disorders in the child's language development and incomplete or delayed establishm ent of preferred laterality. The development of preferential laterality is a m anifestation of cerebral dominance.…”

mentioning

confidence: 99%

Cluttering

Bradford¹

1970

Folia Phoniatr Logop

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The problem of Cerebral dominance the relationship between handedness and language function

Cited by 4 publications

References 17 publications

Left-handedness.

Left-handedness.

El dominansı ve koroner dominans arası ilişki

Cluttering

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About