2023
DOI: 10.31857/s013216250022927-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Problem of “Agency” Through the Prism of a New Reality: Conditions and Perspectives

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

1
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…After R. Osborne, J. Tanner (Osborne & Tanner, 2007 ) and T. Zolghadr’s research (Zolghadr, 2013 ) decade ago, the present paper is the first attempt to propose a typology of agency manifestations in contemporary art in academic literature. The specific feature of our approach is that we use sociological theory of de-structuration and related conceptualization of agency (amongst many other interpretations of agency not only in literature on art (briefly described above), but in social theory (see Sorokin 2020 , Sorokin 2023 )). We refer to various methodological approaches and ideas in academic literature on art (formal analysis, culture-historical approach, social theory of art, the conceptions of psychology and philosophy), however, all of these are re-interpreted in line with the main theoretical argument of this article – that analysis of contemporary art as a special area for agency manifestation and expression allows to reveal such approaches, ideas and concepts that are less visible in other areas of public life – and, thus, such analysis may be integrated in mainstream research and debates in academic and expert literature on agency.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…After R. Osborne, J. Tanner (Osborne & Tanner, 2007 ) and T. Zolghadr’s research (Zolghadr, 2013 ) decade ago, the present paper is the first attempt to propose a typology of agency manifestations in contemporary art in academic literature. The specific feature of our approach is that we use sociological theory of de-structuration and related conceptualization of agency (amongst many other interpretations of agency not only in literature on art (briefly described above), but in social theory (see Sorokin 2020 , Sorokin 2023 )). We refer to various methodological approaches and ideas in academic literature on art (formal analysis, culture-historical approach, social theory of art, the conceptions of psychology and philosophy), however, all of these are re-interpreted in line with the main theoretical argument of this article – that analysis of contemporary art as a special area for agency manifestation and expression allows to reveal such approaches, ideas and concepts that are less visible in other areas of public life – and, thus, such analysis may be integrated in mainstream research and debates in academic and expert literature on agency.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Now it is even more evident: diversity of competing ideological images, cultural frames and individual "agentic" strategies has increased tremendously in the last several years -questioning previously unproblematic beliefs concerning core features of human nature, possible modes of individual conduct, and dimensions of societal progress. Sociological literature offered the "de-structuration" concept as a tool for conceptualizing these processes (Sorokin & Froumin, 2020, Sorokin 2023. "Destructuration" implies not only increasing uncertainty and turbulence in social life but also the central role of individual agency for personal well-being and mobility, and also for societal dynamics, including the evolution of institutions and communities (Sorokin, 2020).…”
Section: Introduction: De-structurationmentioning
confidence: 99%