2001
DOI: 10.1111/j.0014-3820.2001.tb00772.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Probability That Beneficial Mutations Are Lost in Populations With Periodic Bottlenecks

Abstract: Abstract. Population bottlenecks affect the dynamics of evolution, increasing the probability that beneficial mutations will be lost. Recent protocols for the experimental study of evolution involve repeated bottlenecks-when fresh media are inoculated during serial transfer or when chemostat tubes are changed. Unlike population reductions caused by stochastic environmental factors, these bottlenecks occur at known, regular intervals and with a fixed dilution ratio. We derive the ultimate probability of extinct… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
91
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 107 publications
(93 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
2
91
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Heffernan & Wahl (2002) incorporated the latter effect, assuming a Poisson distribution of offspring during the growth phase, and using a method based on the work of Ewens (1967). This model predicted a greater than 25 per cent reduction in the fixation probability for realistic experimental protocols, compared with that predicted by Wahl & Gerrish (2001).…”
Section: Population Bottlenecksmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Heffernan & Wahl (2002) incorporated the latter effect, assuming a Poisson distribution of offspring during the growth phase, and using a method based on the work of Ewens (1967). This model predicted a greater than 25 per cent reduction in the fixation probability for realistic experimental protocols, compared with that predicted by Wahl & Gerrish (2001).…”
Section: Population Bottlenecksmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This essentially gives the best chance for various mutations of different selective advantages to fix in a population. The ideal passage sizes calculated in these studies are relatively large (13.5% and 20%) (19,20). As mentioned previously, a larger passage size necessitates an increase in resources.…”
mentioning
confidence: 71%
“…Theoretical studies have looked at the effect of passage size on serially passaged batch culture adaptation and have resulted in various predictions of an ideal passage size, depending on the model used (19,20). The ideal passage sizes calculated are ideal from a mathematical standpoint.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We implemented a severe bottleneck of 50 to 100 cells per transfer, which has been shown to accelerate Muller's ratchet by increasing the stochasticity of the experiment and consequently the frequency of transferring and fixing deleterious mutations. A severe bottleneck also reduces the frequency of selective sweeps of beneficial mutations and the associated hitchhiking mutations (17)(18)(19)(50)(51)(52)(53). Periodic examination of mating abilities revealed no loss of conjugation capacity at the population level over the course of evolution.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Previous reports in the literature indicate that small effective population sizes and high mutation rates are much more sensitive to Muller's ratchet (55). Therefore, we used a small effective population size of (calculated with the harmonic mean [50]) ϳ120 and a mutator strain. However, we failed to observe mutational meltdown in any of our populations over the course of ϳ850 generations; a similar mutational meltdown experiment in yeast resulted in only one meltdown in a longer time frame (22).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%