2005
DOI: 10.1142/s0219720005001120
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Probability Distribution for a Random Match Between an Experimental-Theoretical Spectral Pair in Tandem Mass Spectrometry

Abstract: Proteomic techniques are fast becoming the main method for qualitative and quantitative determination of the protein content in biological systems. Despite notable advances, efficient and accurate analysis of high throughput proteomic data generated by mass spectrometers remains one of the major stumbling blocks in the protein identification problem. We present a model for the number of random matches between an experimental MS-MS spectrum and a theoretical spectrum of a peptide. The shape of the probability d… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
19
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In peptide identification research, database search techniques have been commonly used to select a candidate set of peptides based on the degree of matching between the "theoretical" (expected) mass spectra of candidate peptides in a protein database and the empirical spectra in the input sample [1], [2], [4], [5], [6], [7], [8]. The theoretical spectrum of each peptide can be automatically derived by rules from the amino acid sequences of proteins.…”
Section: Background and Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In peptide identification research, database search techniques have been commonly used to select a candidate set of peptides based on the degree of matching between the "theoretical" (expected) mass spectra of candidate peptides in a protein database and the empirical spectra in the input sample [1], [2], [4], [5], [6], [7], [8]. The theoretical spectrum of each peptide can be automatically derived by rules from the amino acid sequences of proteins.…”
Section: Background and Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many technical solutions have been developed for the peptide identification step in the past two decades, including commercially available software [1], [2], [4], [5], [6], [7], [8]. However, for the second step, the current literature is relatively sparse.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The data generated from these machines is stochastic in nature and complex algorithms are required for post-processing of the raw data, e.g., phosphopeptide filtering [14], false positive rate estimation [4], quantification of proteins from large data sets [13], and phosphorylation site assignments [24], [26]. Other advanced methods include techniques to discriminate between different ions [32], estimating the probabilities of random match between an experimental-theoretical spectral pair [11], and identification of specific protein interactions using MS data [20]. As more high-throughput mass spectrometers are introduced, more efficient and novel computational tools are required to deal with these large data sets.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this approach, experimental MS/MS spectra are annotated by theoretically derived spec-tra predicted by peptides contained in a protein sequence database. Several database search tools are available, including SEQUEST (14), MASCOT (15), X!TANDEM (16), and others (17)(18)(19)(20). A current challenge for high-throughput proteomics is to use database search results from large numbers of MS/MS spectra to derive a list of identified peptides and their corresponding proteins.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%