1983
DOI: 10.1007/bf01069164
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The PRIZ system and propositional calculus

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

1990
1990
1996
1996

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Despite the fact that several intuitionistic theorem provers have been implemented (see [3], [13], [1]), only very few published papers describe the actual implementation of an automated theorem prover and bring the results of running the prover on some benchmarks: [17] and [12] are known to us. The prover described in [17] is limited to propositional calculus.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Despite the fact that several intuitionistic theorem provers have been implemented (see [3], [13], [1]), only very few published papers describe the actual implementation of an automated theorem prover and bring the results of running the prover on some benchmarks: [17] and [12] are known to us. The prover described in [17] is limited to propositional calculus.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Relatively few papers are devoted on proof search in intuitionistic logic. The following is an incomplete list of such papers: [17], [5], [1], [7], [18], [10], [16], [12], [13], [3], [8].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The idea of the main construction, however, originates from G.E.Mints. For ordinary intuitionistic propositional calculus, similar construction was described in detail in a 1983 article (Volozh, Matskin, Mints and Tyugu 1983). Its essence is to \project" second-order equivalences: F , 8P:P and a _ b , 8P:((a ) P)&(b ) P) ) P)…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Using this, one can eliminate some connectives and constants (ordinary intuitionistic disjunction and \false" in (Volozh, Matskin, Mints and Tyugu 1983)) and preserve derivability.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation