1985
DOI: 10.1177/003288558506500210
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Privatization of Corrections: Methodological Issues and Dilemmas Involved in Evaluative Research

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

1987
1987
1997
1997

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Also, since for-profit private correctional institutions run by corporations are relatively new, there is very little collected data available that could serve as evaluative benchmarks. Similarly, there may be some reluctance from the management and staff to fully cooperate with the researchers (Durham, 1988), although Roberts and Powers (1985) claim that the evaluation of private prisons is not much different from that of other prisons. Nevertheless, there is a lack of adequate evaluation of the performance of private prisons (Durham, 1989).…”
Section: Monitoring Correctional Corporations and Evaluating Performancementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Also, since for-profit private correctional institutions run by corporations are relatively new, there is very little collected data available that could serve as evaluative benchmarks. Similarly, there may be some reluctance from the management and staff to fully cooperate with the researchers (Durham, 1988), although Roberts and Powers (1985) claim that the evaluation of private prisons is not much different from that of other prisons. Nevertheless, there is a lack of adequate evaluation of the performance of private prisons (Durham, 1989).…”
Section: Monitoring Correctional Corporations and Evaluating Performancementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The evaluation also concluded that "while the operation of a formerly public sector facility by a nonprofit organization has shown both positive and negative features, in general this example of the private sector in corrections reveals no strong support for this management alternative." Roberts and Powers (1985), however, challenge the method by which Levinson evaluated the relative costs of public and private management• Camp and Camp (1985) note that CCA's Silverdale Penal Farm in Chattanooga, Tennessee sustained $200,000 in cost overruns to the county as a result of increased inmate population due to more stringent drunk-driving laws. In addition, they write that 17 escapes took place in the first six months of operation, twice the number experienced by the county during the same period of the previous year.…”
Section: The Inherent Efficiency Of the Private Sectormentioning
confidence: 99%