1960
DOI: 10.1001/archderm.1960.03730020061010
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Private Dermatologist and Skin Cancer

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

1967
1967
2002
2002

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Only one other study could be located that compared recurrence rates of nonmelanoma skin cancers treated by curettage and desiccation vs. excision in private practice. This study, from 1960, reported a raw recurrence rate of BCCs and SCCs as 2.8% (2/71) for excision and 4.9% (4/82) for curettage and desiccation 11 . The number of BCCs vs. SCCs in each treatment group was not specified.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Only one other study could be located that compared recurrence rates of nonmelanoma skin cancers treated by curettage and desiccation vs. excision in private practice. This study, from 1960, reported a raw recurrence rate of BCCs and SCCs as 2.8% (2/71) for excision and 4.9% (4/82) for curettage and desiccation 11 . The number of BCCs vs. SCCs in each treatment group was not specified.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In a recent review, Thissen et al 3 found the cumulative 5‐year recurrence rate for BCC to be 3.2–8.0% for excision and 5.7–18.8% for curettage and desiccation. (The 5.7% rate is taken from the study by Kopf et al 11 discussed above.) From this data, the authors concluded “if surgery is not contraindicated, [surgical excision] remains the treatment modality of first choice for BCCs” (p.1182).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…(2) Eighteen studies reported on populations of patients, some of which had basal cell carcinoma and others squamous cell carcinoma, but failed to separate the histologic type when reporting recurrence rates and thus could not be used for this investigation. [2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19] (3) A recent study by Hall et a1.,20 which reported a short-term recurrence rate of 39% in cryotherapy, was not used because the recurrence rate was 3 times higher than that of any other author. Also, Hall et al are radiotherapists, who may not have had proper training on the administration of cryotherapy and who may have been biased against cryotherapy .…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The ‘real world’ applicability of high C & ED cure rates is evidenced by the fact that C & ED is one of the most commonly employed treatment modalities for skin cancer worldwide. 6,19,25,26,30,47,48,55,59,74–76 …”
Section: Cure Ratesmentioning
confidence: 99%