2012
DOI: 10.1074/jbc.m112.368803
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Prion Protein Preference of Sporadic Creutzfeldt-Jakob Disease Subtypes

Abstract: Background: Sporadic Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease (CJD) encompasses a spectrum of clinical phenotypes, the origin of which has not been fully elucidated. Results: Cell-free prion protein misfolding by sporadic CJD subtypes was affected by brain tissue composition and not related to absolute levels of PrP C . Conclusion: Tissue environment contributes to CJD subtype-specific prion protein misfolding. Significance: Non-PrP C cofactors may contribute to the development of sporadic CJD.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 55 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…(2) the mutants A117V and M129V cause GSS [49,50,51] and CJD [52,53] respectively, (3) the β-sheet core of PrP Sc consists of three layers of β-strands E1(116-119), E2(129-132) and E3(160-164) [54], where E1 and E2 are in the hydrophobic region (109-136), (4) H111 is a residue of copper binding sites [55,56,57,58], (5) Y128 is in the center of HB-and-SB-network of HB(Y128-D178), SB(D178-R164), HB(Y128-R164), HB(Y128-H177), HB(H177-N154) [59,60,61,62], (6) A133 and S132 have HBs with R220 and a water binding site with G131 [63,64], in PrP(113-132) the hydrophobic cluster with vdWs rendering of atoms in residues 113-127 interacts with the first β-strand (see Figure 2(B) of [65]), M129 makes interactions with the side chain of V122 and pulls the N-terminus into the β-sheet [61] and M129 is very close to Y163 [31], (7) conservation of the Gly-rich region PrP(119-131) is required for uptake of prion infectivity [3,66,67] is shown by the physical or chemical properties of numerous mutations in the PrP(119-131) Gly-rich region [3], (8) one O-linked sugar at Ser135 can affect the coil-to-β structural transition of the prion peptide, but at Ser132 the effect is opposite [68], etc., and (9) the NMR structure of HuPrP(110-136) in dodecylphosphocholine micelles was known (2LBG.pdb) [69] and we do MD simulations for it as follows.…”
Section: Molecules In This Parts Of the Truncated Octahedral Box Of Tmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(2) the mutants A117V and M129V cause GSS [49,50,51] and CJD [52,53] respectively, (3) the β-sheet core of PrP Sc consists of three layers of β-strands E1(116-119), E2(129-132) and E3(160-164) [54], where E1 and E2 are in the hydrophobic region (109-136), (4) H111 is a residue of copper binding sites [55,56,57,58], (5) Y128 is in the center of HB-and-SB-network of HB(Y128-D178), SB(D178-R164), HB(Y128-R164), HB(Y128-H177), HB(H177-N154) [59,60,61,62], (6) A133 and S132 have HBs with R220 and a water binding site with G131 [63,64], in PrP(113-132) the hydrophobic cluster with vdWs rendering of atoms in residues 113-127 interacts with the first β-strand (see Figure 2(B) of [65]), M129 makes interactions with the side chain of V122 and pulls the N-terminus into the β-sheet [61] and M129 is very close to Y163 [31], (7) conservation of the Gly-rich region PrP(119-131) is required for uptake of prion infectivity [3,66,67] is shown by the physical or chemical properties of numerous mutations in the PrP(119-131) Gly-rich region [3], (8) one O-linked sugar at Ser135 can affect the coil-to-β structural transition of the prion peptide, but at Ser132 the effect is opposite [68], etc., and (9) the NMR structure of HuPrP(110-136) in dodecylphosphocholine micelles was known (2LBG.pdb) [69] and we do MD simulations for it as follows.…”
Section: Molecules In This Parts Of the Truncated Octahedral Box Of Tmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Heparin and HS have also been shown to induce and accelerate oligomeric and fibrillar complex formation upon their addition to PrP peptides (Gonzalez-Iglesias et al 2002;Boshuizen et al 2007;Bazar and Jelinek 2010;Di Domizio et al 2012). GAGs, including PPS, HS and HSPG, have been investigated as cofactors in the conversion of PrP C to PrP Sc in cell free conversion assays and have been shown to both enhance or have no effect on the conversion process (Wong et al 2001;Ben-Zaken et al 2003;Deleault et al 2005;Lawson et al 2010;Klemm et al 2012). This may be because many factors influence PrP-GAG interactions including the degree of GAG sulfation and overall size of the GAGs (Gabizon et al 1993;Ben-Zaken et al 2003;Ouidja et al 2007;Lawson et al 2010;Monsellier et al 2010).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It was suggested that in vitro conversion using a hamster substrate was mostly dependent on the availability of PrPc. However, it was not confirmed in a study using grey and white matter of the same sample [75]. Moreover, it was shown that a high level of PrPc expression does not systematically correlate with a high conversion rate.…”
Section: Acellular Models Of Prion Strain Tropismmentioning
confidence: 87%
“…This suggests that RNAs are not essential cofactors that influence brain targeting by human prion strains. Other cofactor candidates include metal ions [64], glycosaminoglycans [84], laminin receptor (LRP/LR) [85,86,87], and anionic lipids [61,75]. For example, poly-anionic cofactors affected the strain specificity of infectious recombinant prions generated in vitro [88].…”
Section: Acellular Models Of Prion Strain Tropismmentioning
confidence: 99%