The Principles of Constitutional Reform

Weinrib, Jacob

doi:10.1017/s1369415419000347

Cited by 4 publications

(4 citation statements)

References 14 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…This is what makes norms of law or legal norm specific. Reflecting the will of the state power (or the majority in a democracy), it is obligatory by nature (Weinrib, 2019).…”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Law As A Regulator Of Public Relations In The Constitutionalism Development Context

Бочкарев¹

2021

European Proceedings of Social and Behavioural Sciences

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…This is what makes norms of law or legal norm specific. Reflecting the will of the state power (or the majority in a democracy), it is obligatory by nature (Weinrib, 2019).…”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Law As A Regulator Of Public Relations In The Constitutionalism Development Context

Бочкарев¹

2021

European Proceedings of Social and Behavioural Sciences

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…At Kants rettsfilosofi har demokratiske implikasjoner er ikke ukontroversielt, men heller ikke et nytt syn innen Kantforskningen. Se for eksempel Maus (1994), Eberl (2008), Thiele (2008) og Weinrib (2019) for demokratiske lesninger av Kant. Se Habermas (1996) for en lesning som gjør Kant til en autoritaer statsteoretiker.…”

Section: Fortolkningsproblemetunclassified

“…En stats rettferdighet viser på sin side til moralske plikter som påfaller legitime makthavere. Ifølge Jacob Weinrib, kan disse pliktene knyttes til Kants idé om en opprinnelig kontrakt, som innebaerer et ideal om en rettsorden der alle borgeres frihet forblir uforminsket (Weinrib, 2019;Kant, MdS 6:316, G 8:302). Slik Weinrib, etter min mening overbevisende, utlegger dette idealet om rettferdig maktutøvelse, krever det kontinuerlig reform i retning lover som er liberale med henblikk på innhold og demokratiske med henblikk på prosedyrene for vedtak (Weinrib, 2019, s. 636, 638).…”

Section: Det Demokratiske Reformargumentetunclassified

Med Kant mot ulikhet

Mikalsen

2021

NFT

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Med utgangspunkt i Kants rettsfilosofi, tar jeg til orde for at rettferdig maktutøvelse krever økonomisk omfordeling. Mot den vanlige oppfatningen om at Kants politiske tenkning mangler økonomiske implikasjoner, viser jeg hvordan republikanske fortolkninger av hans rettsfilosofi lykkes i å rekonstruere en overbevisende argumentasjon til fordel for offentlig fattigdomsbekjempelse. Jeg viser også hvordan de økonomiske implikasjonene av Kants teori går ut over offentlig støtte til fattige. Som institusjonelle frihetsbetingelser, har stater en plikt til å fjerne hindringer for demokratisk selvlovgivning. Det er rimelig å betrakte økonomisk ulikhet som en slik hindring. Offentlig fattigdomsbekjempelse er derfor utilstrekkelig. For å utøve politisk makt på en rettferdig måte, må offentlige myndigheter også iverksette tiltak for å minke gapet mellom de rikeste og de fattigste.

show abstract

“…Во-первых, конституция, в том числе и поправки к ней, позволяет гражданам закреплять в форме высшего закона свои убеждения. Во-вторых, конституционные поправки преследуют своей целью усовершенствование и укрепление существующего конституционного порядка, а не его разрушение [5].…”

Section: Introductionunclassified

Constitutional reform as a vector of national development in the modern world (in the context of Russia, Belarus, and Kazakhstan)

Nikitin¹,

Vinogradova²

2023

Vektor nauki Tol’attin. gos. univ., Ser. Urid. nauki

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The research provides a comparative legal analysis of the constitutional reforms that took place from 2020 till 2022 in the Russian Federation, the Republic of Belarus and the Republic of Kazakhstan. The paper formulates the author’s assessments and conclusions, a look at the transformations of the Constitutions of Russia, Belarus and Kazakhstan through the identification of the common and specific aspects in the constitutional arrangement of these states based on the following criteria: the purpose of the constitutional reform; improvement of the institution of the executive head of the nation; improvement of the system of checks and balances; the judiciary reforming; development of the social and cultural policy of the government. As a result of the study, the authors come to the conclusion that constitutional and legal development in the abovementioned states is similar. Particular attention is paid to the principle of separation of powers, under which amendments to the fundamental laws establish additional guarantees that protect and preserve the continuous state-legal development of the countries, their sovereignty, in particular, by securing preliminary normative control at the level of the Constitutional Courts. In addition, the issue of maintaining the stability of power in these states has been studied: by securing additional guarantees, acting as “filters”, for the status of the executive head of the nation in Russia and Belarus, and by resolving the issue of the presidential duumvirate in Kazakhstan. The authors also focus on socio-cultural amendments in the Constitutions of Russia and Belarus, which act as guarantees for the sustainable social and economic development of the countries. According to the authors, these amendments expand the concept of the “welfare state” and allow setting new tasks for the government and society for the next decades.

show abstract

The Principles of Constitutional Reform

Cited by 4 publications

References 14 publications

Law As A Regulator Of Public Relations In The Constitutionalism Development Context

Law As A Regulator Of Public Relations In The Constitutionalism Development Context

Med Kant mot ulikhet

Constitutional reform as a vector of national development in the modern world (in the context of Russia, Belarus, and Kazakhstan)

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About