2008
DOI: 10.1007/s11673-008-9124-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Principle of Caveat Emptor: Confidentiality and Informed Consent as Endemic Ethical Dilemmas in Focus Group Research

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
28
0
2

Year Published

2012
2012
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(30 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
28
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…This inexperience, coupled with a sensitive research topic and the involvement of their peers as research participants, has the potential to create serious ethical problems. Furthermore, specific ethical dilemmas, such as limits to confidentiality and researcher control, are endemic to the method of focus group interviewing itself (Tolich 2009). …”
Section: Practical Considerations and Limitationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This inexperience, coupled with a sensitive research topic and the involvement of their peers as research participants, has the potential to create serious ethical problems. Furthermore, specific ethical dilemmas, such as limits to confidentiality and researcher control, are endemic to the method of focus group interviewing itself (Tolich 2009). …”
Section: Practical Considerations and Limitationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Such ethical issues with student-led focus group research are unavoidable but can be minimized through strict adherence to IRB standards. This includes using best practices with informed consent forms (Morgan 1998;Tolich 2009), providing substantial training in focus group moderating, and simply encouraging student-researchers to study more-benign and lessfraught topics (Kitzinger and Barbour 1999).…”
Section: Practical Considerations and Limitationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We recognized the particular ethical issues in researching such a sensitive subject at a time when participants may be vulnerable, and paid careful attention to obtaining informed consent and maintaining confidentiality of the data generated (Corbin and Morse 2003;Parkes 1995;Denzin 2009;Tolich 2009). We made strenuous efforts to involve local funeral directors, faith groups and other celebrants in order to reduce potential difficulties in accessing both funerals and the bereaved families.…”
Section: The Study and Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Informed written consent was obtained from all participants, also providing a letter communicating the necessary information pertaining to the project. Although the researchers could not offer participants of the focus group internal confidentiality because it was outside their control, external confidentiality [34] was maintained through the anonymity of responses. Participation was voluntary and no form of compensation was awarded to the participants.…”
Section: Ethical Considerationsmentioning
confidence: 99%