1985
DOI: 10.1016/0021-9991(85)90165-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Princeton spectral equilibrium code: PSEC

Abstract: A fast computer code has been developed to calculate free-boundary solutions to the plasma equilibrium equation that are consistent with the currents in external coils and conductors. The free-boundary formulation is based on the minimization of a mean-square error e while the fixed-boundary solution is based on a variational principle and spectral representation of the coordinates x(iji,fi) an.A z(n),6)-Specific calculations using the Columbia University Torus 11/ the Poloidal Divertor Experiment (PDX), and t… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

1986
1986
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A second respect in which the present procedure departs from existing methods is through the use of a spectral Green's function approach for computing the scalar magnetic potential $ and hence the self-consistent vacuum magnetic field, which is normal to S p . Green's functions have been previously used [18] in plasmas with toroidal symmetry to compute the axisymmetric component of the vector potential, V> = -RA^. Compared with a relaxation scheme for computing the vacuum potential [4], there are at least two advantages to a Green's function approach when the vacuum field is coupled with the moving plasma boundary:…”
Section: Free Boundary Equationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A second respect in which the present procedure departs from existing methods is through the use of a spectral Green's function approach for computing the scalar magnetic potential $ and hence the self-consistent vacuum magnetic field, which is normal to S p . Green's functions have been previously used [18] in plasmas with toroidal symmetry to compute the axisymmetric component of the vector potential, V> = -RA^. Compared with a relaxation scheme for computing the vacuum potential [4], there are at least two advantages to a Green's function approach when the vacuum field is coupled with the moving plasma boundary:…”
Section: Free Boundary Equationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These schemes generally fall into two categories. Eulerian or "direct" solvers use a prescribed mesh to calculate the unknown function [13,17,19,21,29], while Lagrangian or "inverse" solvers find the mapping of the plasma geometry in terms of magnetic coordinates [7,16,25,27,42]. The advantages and disadvantages of one formulation as compared to the other depend on the application of interest [43], on the plasma geometry, and on the type of inputs that plasma stability and transport codes require.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nevertheless, when the source term has a simple form, we can use Green's functions to solve the GS equation. However, except for a small number of simple forms for the source function, numerical methods such as finite differences (Johnson et al 1979), spectral methods (Ling & Jardin 1985), spectral elements (Howell & Sovinec 2014), and linear finite elements (Gruber et al 1987) should be used. In applications to NSs, numerical solvers such as the HSCF method (Lander & Jones 2009), Gauss-Seidel method (Gourgouliatos et al 2013) or the generalised Newton's method (Armaza et al 2015) have been used.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%