1995
DOI: 10.1080/03078698.1995.9674108
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The primary moult of Curlew Sandpiper in the Ebro Delta, North‐East Spain

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

1998
1998
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

1
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, the number of birds that started wing moult in the study area was small (6.2% of the adult birds ringed in autumns 1992 and 1993), and although more males started to moult in the study area in 1993, no difference in the number of males and females moulting in the area was detected in 1992. 17 Longer stopovers of males were reported in both years, so we also reject the possibility that differences in moult patterns were the cause of the reported sex differences in stopover length (at least of those found in 1992).…”
Section: Sex Differences In Stopover Ecologymentioning
confidence: 46%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, the number of birds that started wing moult in the study area was small (6.2% of the adult birds ringed in autumns 1992 and 1993), and although more males started to moult in the study area in 1993, no difference in the number of males and females moulting in the area was detected in 1992. 17 Longer stopovers of males were reported in both years, so we also reject the possibility that differences in moult patterns were the cause of the reported sex differences in stopover length (at least of those found in 1992).…”
Section: Sex Differences In Stopover Ecologymentioning
confidence: 46%
“…14 Data from moulting birds were not included in the analysis because moulting increases the energetic requirements of birds 15,16 and the rate of reserve accumulation at the study area was lower in moulting than in non-moulting Curlew Sandpipers. 17 Because the rate of reserve accumulation was one of the variables that affect stopover decisions, 2 the inclusion of these birds would have affected the results of our analysis.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Regarding sex differences, our results suggest that if the sexes differ in moult timing, it would rather be the males that start moult before females, which is contrary to what is mentioned in Cramp & Simmons (1983). Sex differences in the timing of post-breeding moult in waders was previously explained by sex differences in parental care, where the sex tending the offspring longest usually begins moult later (Figuerola & Bertolero 1995, Barshep et al 2013, Dietz et al 2013. However, in godwits both sexes take care of the chicks (Cramp & Simmons 1983).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This species exhibits reversed sexual size dimorphism, with bill length being the most useful linear body measurement for sexing this species, as females have distinctly longer bill than males (Glutz von Blotzheim et al 1975, Cramp & Simmons 1983. The current method for sexing Curlew Sandpipers using a discrimination function was developed by Wymenga et al (1990) from measurements of museum specimens, and has been widely applied (Figuerola & Bertolero 1995, Melter & Kepp 2006, Barshep et al 2011, Barshep et al 2012. Wymenga et al (1990) do not, however, offer error rates associated with their methodology, nor is there information on the sample size of birds used in their analysis.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%