The Primary Care Performance of Three Types of Medical Institutions: A Public Survey using the Korean Primary Care Assessment Tool

Abstract

These authors contributed equally this work. *These authors also contributed equally to this work.Purpose: The healthcare system of South Korea is at the extreme of the dispersed system. Few regulations limit patients from directly visiting higher-level medical institutions for primary care sensitive conditions. As a result, similar to local clinics, general and tertiary teaching hospitals also provide diverse primary care services. Our study aimed to examine the general public's perceptions of their primary care performance.Methods: Face-to-face surveys were conducted with 1000 adults who were living in South Korea with the aid of a questionnaire that included the Korean Primary Care Assessment Tool (KPCAT). The KPCAT consists of five domains, which are the main indicators of primary care performance: first contact, comprehensiveness, coordination, personalized care, and family/community orientation. One-way analysis of variance and post hoc tests were used to compare the KPCAT scores across the three types of medical institutions.Results: Domain-wise analyses revealed two different patterns. With regard to first contact and its subdomains, the highest and lowest scores emerged for local clinics and tertiary teaching hospitals, respectively. However, the other four domain scores were significantly lower for local clinics than for the other two types of medical institutions.Conclusions: Local clinics were perceived to be medical institutions that are responsible for providing primary care. However, the general public perceived only one domain of their primary care to be superior to that of the other two types of medical institutions: first contact. National efforts should be taken to strengthen their other four domains of primary care by training their workforce and providing appropriate incentives.

Comparison of new implantation of cardiac implantable electronic device between tertiary and non-tertiary hospitals: a Korean nationwide study

“…Concentration of patients in tertiary hospitals causes not only the economic problem in terms of waste of health care resource and the loss of opportunity cost for other hospitals but also the delay of timely treatment. Previous studies showed that patients tend to make choices based on hospital size, facility, modernity, and professional credibility 7 , 8 . The phenomenon of the concentration in tertiary hospitals might derive due to the lack of information (such as clinical outcomes).…”

“…With no strict gatekeeping system, it is relatively easy for patients to access secondary care in tertiary hospitals. In addition, patients generally prefer tertiary hospitals to non-tertiary hospitals because they believe that the quality of care that is provided by tertiary hospitals is better than that of non-tertiary hospitals 7 . These engender the concentration of patients in tertiary hospitals and results in the waste of health care resource and delay of timely treatment 8 .…”

The Quality of Primary Care Performance in Private Sector Facilities in Nairobi, Kenya: A Cross-Sectional Descriptive Survey

“…Such high utilisation might be due to the physical proximity of the clinics and satisfaction with the services offered, although such services were limited in scope (39). (50)(53)…”