2011
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1001139
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Primacy of Public Health Considerations in Defining Poor Quality Medicines

Abstract: Paul Newton and colleagues argue that public health, and not intellectual property or trade issues, should be the prime consideration in defining and combating counterfeit medicines, and that the World Health Organization (WHO) should take a more prominent role.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
100
0
1

Year Published

2013
2013
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
3

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 93 publications
(101 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
(17 reference statements)
0
100
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Chemical and packaging analysis is required to conclude if a medicine is substandard or counterfeit. This, however, is difficult and rarely reported 13. Therefore, the term substandard/counterfeit medicine is used in this review unless studies formally assessed packaging to differentiate medicines into these two different categories.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Chemical and packaging analysis is required to conclude if a medicine is substandard or counterfeit. This, however, is difficult and rarely reported 13. Therefore, the term substandard/counterfeit medicine is used in this review unless studies formally assessed packaging to differentiate medicines into these two different categories.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Substandard TB drugs may also result in treatment failure and the development of resistance [9]. Linezolid, bedaquiline and delamanid are expensive and generics could further reduce cost and facilitate treatment of more patients.…”
Section: Antibiotic Stewardship For Xdr-tbmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Newton's definition, low quality drugs encompass falsified/counterfeit, substandard or degraded drugs [10]. This definition seems practical and adapted to the study in the present paper.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%