1992
DOI: 10.1292/jvms.54.557
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Prevalence of Types I and II Feline Coronavirus Infections in Cats.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

13
142
3
2

Year Published

1995
1995
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

4
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 124 publications
(160 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
13
142
3
2
Order By: Relevance
“…FCoV type II strains have hardly been found in Europe and have been detected only incidentally in the United States. 3,16,20,24,25,29 Furthermore, a study 20 has recently observed that a serological differentiation between antibodies to FCoV types I and II may not be possible in the early phase of infection, when crossreacting epitopes of both types are responsible for comparable titers, but only after the infection has resulted in an increase of antibody concentration and specificity. In experimentally FCoV type I infected cats, the antibody development against both types was followed, and it was observed that only after an observation period of more than 17 weeks did antibodies to FCoV type I show a significant increase over those to FCoV type II.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…FCoV type II strains have hardly been found in Europe and have been detected only incidentally in the United States. 3,16,20,24,25,29 Furthermore, a study 20 has recently observed that a serological differentiation between antibodies to FCoV types I and II may not be possible in the early phase of infection, when crossreacting epitopes of both types are responsible for comparable titers, but only after the infection has resulted in an increase of antibody concentration and specificity. In experimentally FCoV type I infected cats, the antibody development against both types was followed, and it was observed that only after an observation period of more than 17 weeks did antibodies to FCoV type I show a significant increase over those to FCoV type II.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…17,18,24 In the field, serotype II accounts for only 20% to 30% of all FCoV infections. 16,27 Type I viruses represent the genuine FCoVs and grow poorly in cell culture. Type II viruses originated from double recombination events between FCoV type I and canine coronavirus (CCoV) 15 ; they proliferate well in cell culture and are widely used for the study of FCoV infection, and consequently, acquisition of genetic data for type I viruses has been lagging behind that of type II viruses.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Competitive enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA): Competitive ELISA was performed as described previously [11]. The viral antigen was purified from the culture supernatant of the cells infected with FIPV 79-1146 strain by sucrose gradient ultracentrifugation.…”
Section: Indirect Immunofluorescence Assay (Ifa)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the type of virus , reinfection by which will cause ADE at the highest frequency in FIPV infection, is unclear. It has been reported that the frequency of type I FCoV infection is high in the field [11].…”
mentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Serotype I FCoV isolates have been numerically superior [22] and predominantly distributed among cats [9]. These differences in antigenic properties are generally consistent with viral growth ability in vitro [2,22]; serotype II FCoVs propagate more readily than serotype I FCoVs in feline cell cultures such as Felis catus whole fetus-4 (fcwf-4) [13] and Crandell feline kidney (CRFK) cells.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 70%