2009
DOI: 10.1016/s0378-5122(09)70271-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Prevalence of Metabolic Syndrome Using Ncep-Atp Iii and Idf Definitions in Brazilian Women After Menopause

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

1
0
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2011
2011

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 0 publications
1
0
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Although obesity and level of physical activity contribute significantly to the frequency of MetS, other factors, such as a genetic predisposition, may play a role (Abate, 2000;Thomas et al, 2000;Das, 2002). Similarly to our study, in previous studies, assessment of MetS using the IDF criteria identified a higher number of subjects than the NECP-ATPIII definition (DECODA, 2007;Deepa, 2007;Ucar et al, 2009;Lima et al, 2009;Valenzuela et al, 2007;Moebus et al, 2007). Another study conducted on Turkish adults (532 men and 1036 women) showed that age-and sex-adjusted prevalence of MetS was 38% by NECP-ATPIII and 42% by IDF, but similar to our study, the agreement between NCEP and IDF definitions was substantial (kappa: 0.77) (Day, 2007).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 81%
“…Although obesity and level of physical activity contribute significantly to the frequency of MetS, other factors, such as a genetic predisposition, may play a role (Abate, 2000;Thomas et al, 2000;Das, 2002). Similarly to our study, in previous studies, assessment of MetS using the IDF criteria identified a higher number of subjects than the NECP-ATPIII definition (DECODA, 2007;Deepa, 2007;Ucar et al, 2009;Lima et al, 2009;Valenzuela et al, 2007;Moebus et al, 2007). Another study conducted on Turkish adults (532 men and 1036 women) showed that age-and sex-adjusted prevalence of MetS was 38% by NECP-ATPIII and 42% by IDF, but similar to our study, the agreement between NCEP and IDF definitions was substantial (kappa: 0.77) (Day, 2007).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 81%