2007
DOI: 10.1017/s1368980007360862
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The prevalence of iodine deficiency in women of reproductive age in the United States of America

Abstract: The concentrations of serum T4 and thyroid-stimulating hormone of women with a low UI concentration did not, however, indicate an iodine deficiency. Conclusions: Further studies of the association between iodine excretion and biochemical and physiological changes should be undertaken to better understand women's needs for iodine and to develop criteria to monitor them in pregnancy. Because of the potential harm caused by iodine deficiency during pregnancy, we support the use of iodine supplements for all pregn… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
36
0
3

Year Published

2009
2009
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 53 publications
(40 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
(71 reference statements)
1
36
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…It was 36 for nonpregnant women, 28-38 for pregnant women, 49-60 for women after delivery, 32 for newborns, and 21 for infants. These results are similar to others found in iodine-deficient areas (11)(12)(13)(14)(15)(16)(17)(18).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…It was 36 for nonpregnant women, 28-38 for pregnant women, 49-60 for women after delivery, 32 for newborns, and 21 for infants. These results are similar to others found in iodine-deficient areas (11)(12)(13)(14)(15)(16)(17)(18).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…Three of the newborns were with very low birth weight (<1500 g), and 14 low birth weight (<2500 g); 3 were macrosomic (>4000 g), and 29 were admitted to the Neonatology Unit (for prematurity, low birth weight, sepsis, or hyperbilirubinemia), where 1 died. Table 3 presents the median UI for women and babies and milk iodine, as well as the percentage of individuals within the iodine classes as defined by the WHO (1)(2)(3)11,12). Figure 1 depicts the cumulative percentage of women taking into consideration the cutoff of iodine sufficiency for the pregnant population (>150 mg=L) and for the nonpregnant population (>100 mg=L) (1)(2)(3)11,12).…”
Section: Demographic Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Nevertheless, iodine nutrition has to be monitored constantly; otherwise iodine intake could rapidly and significantly decrease. For example, in the USA, where adequate iodine intake has been reported for many years, a significant decrease in median UIC was noticed from one survey in 1971-1974 to another in 1988-1994 (31) . However, the study based on the 2003-2004 National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey showed a higher median UIC in pregnant women than in non-pregnant women of childbearing age, 166 mg/l v. 123 mg/l, and 9 % of women had UIC below 50 mg/l.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The 2001-2002 US National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) results suggest that iodine nutrition has stabilized, [2] but levels are barely above the recommendation for the average which means that a significant number of people remain at risk. Women of childbearing age and pregnant women are widely accepted as high-risk groups for inadequate iodine intake, but there is valid concern that additional high-risk groups remain [3, 4]. Three cases of iodine deficiency as a result of restrictive diets in children have been reported in the literature [57].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%