2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.jbiotec.2018.06.222
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The prevalence of Dog Erythrocyte Antigens 1 among the donors of a Romanian canine blood bank

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

1
0

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 0 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The transfusion technology initially developed for human health became more easily available for companion animals, which led to the design and set up of veterinary blood banks Radulescu et al (2009). Like in human transfusion medicine, the canine blood bank use pretransfusion testing for canine erythrocyte antigens Yagi and Bean (2016); Ionescu et al (2018a) and blood-borne pathogens Reine (2004); Ionescu et al (2018b) to minimize the risks associated with blood transfusion. In this regard, our previous studies established that canine blood donors of Romania blood banks were 56.19% (59/105) DEA1 positive [37.29% (22/59) male, and 88.13% (52/59) purebred] and 43.81% (46/105) DEA1 negative [56.52% (26/46) male, and 93.48% (43/46) purebred] Ionescu et al (2018a), provided negative results for B. burgdorferi and E.canis/E.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The transfusion technology initially developed for human health became more easily available for companion animals, which led to the design and set up of veterinary blood banks Radulescu et al (2009). Like in human transfusion medicine, the canine blood bank use pretransfusion testing for canine erythrocyte antigens Yagi and Bean (2016); Ionescu et al (2018a) and blood-borne pathogens Reine (2004); Ionescu et al (2018b) to minimize the risks associated with blood transfusion. In this regard, our previous studies established that canine blood donors of Romania blood banks were 56.19% (59/105) DEA1 positive [37.29% (22/59) male, and 88.13% (52/59) purebred] and 43.81% (46/105) DEA1 negative [56.52% (26/46) male, and 93.48% (43/46) purebred] Ionescu et al (2018a), provided negative results for B. burgdorferi and E.canis/E.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%