2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.schres.2012.11.011
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The prevalence of diabetes mellitus is increased in relatives of patients with a non-affective psychotic disorder

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

5
21
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
5
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The unaffected family group, independent of any psychiatric problems and drug effects, reported 1.6 times the risk compared to healthy controls. This is in agreement with findings from another large sample analysis looking at associations between diabetes and relatives of patients but was restrictive to non-affective psychosis (van Welie et al, 2013). In comparison, our finding is novel due to the inclusion of multiple diagnostic categories (both affective and non-affective psychosis) and is suggestive of CMD prevalence as trans-diagnostic and not restricted to non-affective psychosis.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The unaffected family group, independent of any psychiatric problems and drug effects, reported 1.6 times the risk compared to healthy controls. This is in agreement with findings from another large sample analysis looking at associations between diabetes and relatives of patients but was restrictive to non-affective psychosis (van Welie et al, 2013). In comparison, our finding is novel due to the inclusion of multiple diagnostic categories (both affective and non-affective psychosis) and is suggestive of CMD prevalence as trans-diagnostic and not restricted to non-affective psychosis.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…Our study is reasonably representative of the general population of patients with psychotic disorders, their first degree relatives and healthy controls. By contrast, the van Welie et al study (van Welie et al, 2013) had a much higher mean age (62.5) and included only a Caucasian population, and Mukherjee et al (Mukherjee et al, 1989) used data from a population registry, and lacked a comparable control group.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Family studies have found an increased risk of type 2 diabetes or abnormal glucose in the first degree relatives of people with NAP (Fernandez-Egea et al, 2008a, 2008b; Mukherjee et al, 1989; Van Welie et al, 2013), suggesting patients with psychosis may have an increased risk of diabetes that exists prior to exposure to antipsychotics, many of which increase the risk of diabetes (American Diabetes Association et al, 2004). Some studies of antipsychotic-naive patients with NAP have also found increased fasting glucose (Ryan et al, 2003) or abnormal glucose tolerance on a glucose tolerance test (Fernandez-Egea et al, 2009), but the results have been inconsistent.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, diabetes represents a significant medical illness among individuals with schizophrenia [15], the prevalence of diabetes being usually increased 2 to 3 fold with them [16]. In effect, the association between schizophrenia and diabetes has been known at least since 1879 [17]. It can be explained by potential cellular and genetic links [18,19] or physical inactivity, poor diet, and cigarette smoking [20,21].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%