1913
DOI: 10.2307/1132917
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Prevalence of Crime in the United States and Its Extent Compared with That in the Leading European States

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

1914
1914
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, this was not obvious to the criminologists and criminal statisticians of the nineteenth century and the early years of the twentieth century. Thus we find somewhat uncritical generalizations based on the prison data that were published on temporal patterns of crime (Ellwood 1910;Falkner 1897;Goebel 1913;Pickard 1885), characteristics of offenders (Boies 1972;Commons 1904;Hewes 1896), and the politically sensitive issue of immigration and crime (Hart 1896;Industrial Commission 1902;Mayo-Smith 1893;Trenor 1904). However, by the late 1920s, perhaps as a consequence of Sutherland's (1924) devastating criticism of prison data, the idea that a census of prisoners could be employed as an index of crime had been effectively laid to rest.…”
Section: National Crime Data Prior To Ucrmentioning
confidence: 81%
“…However, this was not obvious to the criminologists and criminal statisticians of the nineteenth century and the early years of the twentieth century. Thus we find somewhat uncritical generalizations based on the prison data that were published on temporal patterns of crime (Ellwood 1910;Falkner 1897;Goebel 1913;Pickard 1885), characteristics of offenders (Boies 1972;Commons 1904;Hewes 1896), and the politically sensitive issue of immigration and crime (Hart 1896;Industrial Commission 1902;Mayo-Smith 1893;Trenor 1904). However, by the late 1920s, perhaps as a consequence of Sutherland's (1924) devastating criticism of prison data, the idea that a census of prisoners could be employed as an index of crime had been effectively laid to rest.…”
Section: National Crime Data Prior To Ucrmentioning
confidence: 81%
“… 8 See Warner (1934:35) for a list of states publishing court statistics by 1930; most of the series began after 1900, although the earliest was in 1879 by Indiana, quickly followed by Ohio in 1880. See MacDonald (1910b) for a discussion comparing crime statistics in Germany, France, and England from the late 19th into the early 20th century, and Goebel (1913) for a comparison of crime “prevalence” between the United States and “leading” European states. …”
mentioning
confidence: 99%