2004
DOI: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2003.11.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The prevalence of anti-rubella antibodies in women of childbearing age in Poland

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

4
12
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
4

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
4
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Our finding was consistent with the results of other studies from Italy, Kenya, Poland, England, and Canada (17,22,(27)(28)(29) but in contrast to other study from Turkey reporting lack of association between these two variables (15).…”
Section: Rubellasupporting
confidence: 93%
“…Our finding was consistent with the results of other studies from Italy, Kenya, Poland, England, and Canada (17,22,(27)(28)(29) but in contrast to other study from Turkey reporting lack of association between these two variables (15).…”
Section: Rubellasupporting
confidence: 93%
“…Three percent of participating 11 women in the present study appeared to be susceptible to rubella. The data of the 12 present study are comparable to other European countries (Table 3) [17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25]. Any 13 effort should be made to reach high immunisation coverage rate with rubella vaccine, 14 since even with high coverage there still are susceptible women.…”
supporting
confidence: 58%
“…On the other hand, the study showed a null correlation between anti-rubella IgG titres and maternal age. Seroprevalence studies carried out in other countries found positive correlations between the anti-measles IgG titres in neonates/pregnant women and maternal age [14,[28][29][30], and positive [28], negative [31][32][33][34][35] or null [36,37] correlations between the anti-rubella IgG titres in neonates/ pregnant women and maternal age. The present study found the prevalence of protective antirubella IgG titres to be similar in the neonates of autochthonous and immigrant women (96.9 vs. 95.2 %).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, it is difficult to compare prevalences obtained in different seroprevalence studies due to differences in sampling methods, populations studied and serological tests used. The prevalence of protective antirubella IgG titres found in this study in pregnant women (95 %) was similar to the prevalence found in pregnant women in the United States of America (98 %) [37], Colombia (93 %) [33], Brazil (92 %) [34], Iran (96 %) [30], Turkey (94-100 %) [36,39] and Australia (93 %) [31], while it was higher than the prevalence found in Taiwan (89 %) [40], Germany (87 %) [41], Sudan (72 %) [42] and Poland (89 %) [35]. The prevalence of protective anti-measles titres found in this study in pregnant women (89 %) was similar to the prevalence found in pregnant women or neonates in the United States of America (88 %) [37], Argentina (87 %) [28], Japan (80-90 %) [29] and China (90 %) [43], while it was higher than the prevalence found in Germany (79 %) [41] and Iran (82 %) [30].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%