Our system is currently under heavy load due to increased usage. We're actively working on upgrades to improve performance. Thank you for your patience.
2023
DOI: 10.1016/j.autrev.2023.103335
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The prevalence and effects of treatments of rapidly progressive interstitial lung disease of dermatomyositis/polymyositis adults: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 57 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Interstitial lung disease (ILD) in patients diagnosed with idiopathic inflammatory myositis (IIM) has a global prevalence of approximately 41% 2 . A recent meta‐analysis reported that the prevalence of RP‐ILD is 8.9%, with rates being higher in Asian populations—reaching up to 20% in some studies 3–5 . Although no consensus exists on the time frame for RP‐ILD, it is typically characterized by worsening symptoms, hypoxemia, and declines in radiological or lung function over 1–3 months 6–8 …”
Section: Figurementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Interstitial lung disease (ILD) in patients diagnosed with idiopathic inflammatory myositis (IIM) has a global prevalence of approximately 41% 2 . A recent meta‐analysis reported that the prevalence of RP‐ILD is 8.9%, with rates being higher in Asian populations—reaching up to 20% in some studies 3–5 . Although no consensus exists on the time frame for RP‐ILD, it is typically characterized by worsening symptoms, hypoxemia, and declines in radiological or lung function over 1–3 months 6–8 …”
Section: Figurementioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is crucial to acknowledge that different time frames (1 or 3 months) are used for defining RP‐ILD in different studies, which could lead to significant variability in the prevalence and outcomes of RP‐ILD in anti‐MDA5 DM‐ILD among studies 3–8 . This heterogeneity among studies highlights the pressing need for shared criteria for defining RP‐ILD.…”
Section: Figurementioning
confidence: 99%